The Story of a Great Delusion in a Series of Matter-of-Fact ChaptersWhite, William
History
The Story of a Great Delusion in a Series of Matter-of-Fact Chapters
White, William
Vaccination
A reader of the _Inquiry_ in 1798 could never have supposed that it
was an attempt to displace the existing practice of Inoculation.
Nor is there any sign that Jenner at the time contemplated such
an issue. He referred to Variolous Inoculation with respect, and
was satisfied to suggest that in certain cases inoculation with
Horsegrease Cowpox might be substituted with advantage. As to the
permanent existence of Horsegrease Cowpox he was doubtful. Since,
he said, the farmers had traced the infection to the Horse, “the
appearance of the Cowpox may either be entirely extinguished or
become extremely rare.” It may be replied that this behaviour on
the part of Jenner was due to reserve and tact, but the reserve and
tact are invisible. The _Inquiry_ was simply what it appears--a
hasty performance, which, in other hands, developed to more,
far more, than its author contemplated. Subsequently he, and
his friends for him, laid claim to years of research under the
influence of supernatural foresight; but, with the _Inquiry_ before
us, I ask where is the evidence? I take the date, 14th May, 1796,
when Jenner inoculated Phipps from the hand of Sarah Nelmes, as the
time when the project of inoculation with Horsegrease Cowpox began
to assume form, and I maintain that the character, order and dates
of the Cases set forth in the _Inquiry_ plainly show that they were
got together to sustain the conclusion then arrived at. When Mr.
John Simon descants on Jenner’s thirty years of incessant thought,
watching and experimenting which resulted in the production of
that Masterpiece of Medical Induction--_The Inquiry_, the answer
is, Peruse the _Inquiry_, and then say where the fruit of thirty
years of labour is to be found. The assertion is too absurd for
discussion, whatever it may be as an article of faith.
The single point of originality in the _Inquiry_ was the definition
of the disease for which prophylactic efficacy was asserted. The
dairymaids said Cowpox: the farriers said Horsegrease. Jenner
said neither Cowpox nor Horsegrease, but their combination in
Horsegrease Cowpox, which variety of Pox alone ensured life-long
security from Smallpox. We shall see as we proceed how this
position was surrendered and resumed, modified and confused beyond
recognition. Let it suffice at present to say that the note of
Jenner’s _Inquiry_ was HORSEGREASE COWPOX and nothing else. Strike
out HORSEGREASE COWPOX, and the affair is reduced to nonentity.
THE VARIOLOUS TEST.
What was called the Variolous Test worked wonderfully for Jenner;
and as we shall have to refer to it repeatedly, it may be well to
describe and dispose of it at once.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account