The Story of a Great Delusion in a Series of Matter-of-Fact ChaptersWhite, William
History
The Story of a Great Delusion in a Series of Matter-of-Fact Chapters
White, William
Vaccination
This evidence, better than any secondary description, will enable
the reader to appreciate the prevalent furore as it affected the
leaders of the medical world. At the same time it is to be borne
in mind that the craze was superficial. Any radical change in
conviction or practice is never accomplished thus easily or thus
rapidly. The medical men who bore witness for cowpox had been bred
to inoculation with smallpox, for which cowpox was substituted. The
change was essentially trivial. The trouble, the danger, and the
uncertainty of variolous inoculation were generally recognised,
and when cowpox was recommended as a mild form of smallpox, it was
not difficult to appreciate the asserted advantage: for, as it was
argued, no one can have smallpox twice, and as the mildest attack
of smallpox is as prohibitive of a second attack as the severest,
therefore cowpox (which is smallpox in mild form) must protect as
effectually when inoculated. With logic so admirable, it was in
nowise wonderful that so many were carried away; but unfortunately,
as so often happens, matter-of-fact did not correspond to the
admirable logic.
The DUKE OF CLARENCE testified that he had availed himself of
Jenner’s discovery from the outset. His children, his household and
farm servants were all protected. A postillion positively refused
to be operated on, and eighteen months after he caught smallpox
in the most virulent form. Children who had undergone cowpox were
constantly in the room where the lad lay and suffered no harm.
The EARL OF BERKELEY had his son inoculated with cowpox by Dr.
Jenner at the age of six months. One of his maid-servants took
smallpox and died, and the effluvia during her illness was so
offensive that his servants had to move to another part of the
house. To test the reality of his son’s protection, he sent
for Jenner, and got him to inoculate the boy with pox from the
maid. The child was found to be proof, for the inoculation had
no effect--To illustrate the validity of the Gloucestershire
tradition, he related how a man of 72 in his service had caught
cowpox when a boy of 15 whilst milking, and in consequence always
reckoned himself secure from smallpox, exposing himself to the
disease with complete indifference.
LORD ROUS gave similar evidence. His child had been inoculated with
cowpox at the age of three months, and he was perfectly satisfied
that he could never have smallpox.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account