The Story of a Great Delusion in a Series of Matter-of-Fact ChaptersWhite, William
History
The Story of a Great Delusion in a Series of Matter-of-Fact Chapters
White, William
Vaccination
How did they remain unscathed? The question is simple, but it is
crucial. If smallpox were like fire, and men, women, and children
like fuel, why did not all burn? Under what prophylaxy did they
abide secure? Again in this connection, we must not lose sight
of the magic of faith. Things being equal, two persons exposed
to smallpox, one confident that he was invulnerable through
vaccination, and the other apprehensive of danger, the chances are,
that the fearful would be attacked whilst the fearless would have
his faith justified in immunity.
In considerations thus obvious it is not difficult to understand
how the testimony delivered to the Committee had a semblance as of
veracious Nature. Any one who has studied the history of remedies,
or the various quackeries within his own observation, will know
how easy it is to conjure up testimony, with asseverations
presumptuous to question, which by-and-by are gradually discredited
and ultimately disappear in forgetfulness. I have, therefore,
no disposition to be hard on the men of 1802. From our vantage
of experience we see how they were led astray, and recognise
the pressure of the influences under which they acted. Moreover
a remedy that bore the promise of relief from the pest of
smallpox inoculation came with strong seduction. What a pest that
inoculation was, how it was loathed, and how it was submitted to
under the persuasion of duty are written at large in the domestic
memoirs of last century. Every mother among the upper and middle
classes was persuaded that it was necessary for her children
to undergo the variolous ordeal--an ordeal that involved the
deliberate introduction of smallpox into her household. It was
hateful, it was intolerable, and yet it had to be endured! The
doctors minimised the risks to the uttermost, but what they really
believed plainly appeared when vaccination presented itself as an
alternative. Then smallpox inoculation was denounced by its former
practitioners with a fervour that contrasted painfully with their
antecedent professions; whilst parents heard with indescribable
satisfaction that absolute life-long security from smallpox was
henceforward insured at the price of a trifling operation attended
by no peril whatever, and with distinct benefit to health. To make
the contrast clear I subjoin copy of a hand-bill that was posted on
walls and circulated by thousands in London and the country at the
time of which I write, 1801-2.
A TABLE SHEWING THE ADVANTAGES OF VACCINE INOCULATION.
_The Natural _The Inoculated _The Inoculated
Smallpox._ Smallpox._ Cowpock._
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account