The Story of a Great Delusion in a Series of Matter-of-Fact ChaptersWhite, William
History
The Story of a Great Delusion in a Series of Matter-of-Fact Chapters
White, William
Vaccination
The amendment was warmly supported by Mr. Wilberforce, Mr. Windham,
Sir John Sebright, and Mr. Herbert.
Mr. PERCEVAL, as Chancellor of the Exchequer, stood to his
resolution, but with indifferent arguments. It was without
precedent that a vote recommended by Government should be thus
increased. He admitted that Jenner was entitled to much more than
they could afford, but it was also without precedent that so great
a sum as £30,000 (inclusive of the former vote) should be bestowed
on any discoverer.
Mr. WILLIAM SMITH would not submit to these objections. He recited
the triumphs of Vaccination in Asia and America, and said it was
true as of old that a prophet had no honour in his own country.
[An observation singularly inapplicable to Jenner.] He urged the
Committee to vote for the larger sum, and said that whilst the
Chancellor of the Exchequer might in his public capacity protest,
yet in his secret heart he would not be displeased if overborne by
the sentiment of the House, of the country, and of the world.
Mr. WHITBREAD begged the Committee to bear in mind that Jenner
had scorned to monopolise Vaccination, and had thereby sacrificed
a great fortune. He called on the House to vote for the larger
sum. Vaccination furnished the means for lessening the poor rate.
Reduced smallpox signified fewer deaths, fewer orphans, fewer
widows. Vaccination meant better health for the poor and more money
in the pockets of the rich. They would excuse this appeal of his
to the cupidity of the landed interest inasmuch as he had been
anticipated in the exhibition of loftier considerations. He also
wished to relieve the House from a renewal of this question. Let
them reward Jenner once for all, and liberally: and remember that
what was called economy in this connection, if practised by the
House, would be, in the eye of the world, their disgrace.
Others spoke in a similar strain, and when the House divided, 60
voted for Mr. Morris’s amendment, and 47 against it, £20,000 being
carried by a majority of 13. Including the £10,000 voted in 1802,
Jenner was thus awarded £30,000 of public money, in times, too, of
war and scarcity.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account