The Story of a Great Delusion in a Series of Matter-of-Fact ChaptersWhite, William
History
The Story of a Great Delusion in a Series of Matter-of-Fact Chapters
White, William
Vaccination
Thus frustrated, Jenner’s ingenuity took another turn. It was the
belief of farriers that if infected in dressing horses’ greasy
heels, they too were secure from smallpox. The area of this
conviction was narrower than that of the dairy-maids, farriers
being neither so numerous, nor so observant of their beauty: but
Jenner entertained their faith and converted it to his purpose.
Horsegrease protected from smallpox, if cowpox did not. But might
there not be one sort of cowpox that answered to the dairy-maids’
faith, if another sort did not? Happy thought! The defensive sort
was derived from the horsegrease which protected the farriers: the
non-defensive originated spontaneously on the cows. Men, fresh from
handling horses’ greasy heels, milked cows and communicated to them
the horses’ disease. Milkmaids, who in turn contracted from the
cows that sort of pox, were like the farriers secure from smallpox,
yea securer; whilst milkmaids who contracted pox spontaneously
developed on cows were not secure. The milkmaids’ superstition was
therefore justifiable: they were right and they were wrong--right
when they got pox through the cow from the horse; wrong when they
got pox from the cow simply.
Why then, it may be asked, did not Jenner dismiss the cow from
consideration? Why did he not base his prescription on the
farriers’ experience, and use and recommend horsegrease exclusively
for inoculation? The question is an obvious one, but it is not easy
to make out Jenner’s answer with precision. His assertion was,
that--
The virus from the horse is not to be relied upon as rendering
the system secure from variolous infection, but the matter
produced by it on the nipple of the cow is perfectly so--
which was to say that horsegrease attained its highest prophylaxy
after transmission through the cow.
Such was the doctrine of the _Inquiry_, “that master-piece of
medical induction.”
When the doctrine came to be reduced to practice, difficulties
arose. Cowpox was considered wholesome and credible, whilst
horsegrease was repulsive and incredible. Still fact was fact; and
many were ready to accept horsegrease through the cow, or without
the cow, if such indeed were the source of the new salvation.
Cowpox proved to be a rare commodity, whilst horsegrease was
common, and numerous attempts were made to produce cowpox by means
of grease, but ineffectually. At some attempts, Jenner officiated.
Marshall records that--
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account