The Story of a Great Delusion in a Series of Matter-of-Fact ChaptersWhite, William
History
The Story of a Great Delusion in a Series of Matter-of-Fact Chapters
White, William
Vaccination
These Bills are founded on the ignorance or skill of old women,
who are the searchers in every parish, and their reports (very
often what they are bid to say) must necessarily be very
erroneous. Many distempers which prove mortal, are mistaken
for the smallpox, namely, scarlet and malignant fevers with
eruptions, swinepox, measles, St. Anthony’s fire, and such like
appearances, which if they destroy in three or four days (as
frequently happeneth) the distemper can only be guessed at, yet
is generally put down by the searchers as smallpox, especially if
they are told the deceased never had them.[34]
Massey, in the same spirit of good sense, objected to
generalisations about smallpox from the Bills of Mortality, as if
all who died were slain by the disease and by nothing else.
There ought to be no comparison [he said] between sick people,
well regimented with diet and medicine, and those who have no
assistance, or scarcely the necessaries of life.
The miserable poor and parish children make up a great part, at
least one-half of the Bills of Mortality; to confirm this I have
examined several yearly bills, and I find that the out-parishes
generally bury more than the ninety-seven parishes within the
walls, and the parish of Stepney singly, very near as many as the
City of London yearly; this sufficiently shows what little help
and care are taken of the poor sick, which so much abound in all
those places.[35]
Of course there lurks a fallacy in all statistics of disease
wherein conditions of life are not discriminated. Whether patients
survive or die from any zymotic ailment depends upon their breed,
their circumstances, their habits, and their medical treatment
and nursing--all essential particulars, yet difficult to define
and register on a large scale. It would appear that in sound
constitutions, and with fair treatment, smallpox in 1721 was by no
means deadly, whilst in bad constitutions, and with exposure and
neglect, it was extensively fatal. Yet of these differences, little
account was taken by the Inoculators, and the malady was measured
and discussed as though it were something uniform like water or
gold. Massey in one year had 49 cases of smallpox and one death;
in Stepney an equal number of cases might have shown a mortality
of 20 or 30 per cent.; whilst Dr. Nettleton reported that of 1245
cases in Halifax and adjacent towns in Yorkshire, there died 270,
or about 22 per cent.[36]
One of Massey’s fears in relation to inoculation was the risk of
poisoning the blood with more than smallpox. He was not disinclined
to experiment with “duly prepared children infected with smallpox
by inspiration,” for then--
They will run no hazard of being infected by a leprous, venereal,
or scrofulous taint that may, for aught we know, be transplanted
by inoculation.[37]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account