The Story of a Great Delusion in a Series of Matter-of-Fact ChaptersWhite, William
History
The Story of a Great Delusion in a Series of Matter-of-Fact Chapters
White, William
Vaccination
In 1754 inoculation obtained full recognition from the London
College of Physicians. It was declared “that experience had refuted
the arguments urged against the practice; that it was now more
extensively employed in England than ever; and that it was highly
beneficial to mankind.” The fence of hesitation was thrown down,
and to be inoculated became the distinction of all who wished to
be numbered with the enlightened and prudent. That the Circassians
were famous for their beauty, and that they practised inoculation,
was a staple argument, and an irresistible, with a multitude of
Englishwomen. Opposition was chiefly confined to the lower orders,
who objected to have the inoculated at large among them, and in
some places threatened to demolish the houses where inoculation
was performed.[57] Occasionally a medical practitioner acquired
reputation as an inoculator, and was resorted to by patients from a
distance, and his operations were not regarded with much favour by
his neighbours. Thus the physicians and surgeons of Newbury, Berks,
were compelled by their townsmen to promise to inoculate no one who
had not resided in Newbury at least two years.
The new practice created much business, and its distribution
excited some jealousy. Physicians complained that surgeons
inoculated without their assistance, and surgeons that apothecaries
did so likewise. Dr. Kirkpatrick laid down the rule that every
rightly conducted inoculation involved the employment of physician,
surgeon, and apothecary--the physician to prepare and prescribe
for the patient, the surgeon to cut, infuse, and dress, and the
apothecary to make up the medicines. Some, however, dispensed
with all three, and effected their own inoculations. A boy poxed
fourteen of his school-fellows in sport, and amateur inoculators,
male and female, multiplied. As an example of amateur procedure,
Dr. Kirkpatrick relates that a gentleman of Kent sent his servant,
Silvanus, a young man, to Mrs. Chapman, at Heathfield, to be
inoculated. He had to ride thirteen miles, and arrived hot and
fatigued at the house of the inoculatrix. As he had taken his
preparatory physic at his master’s, Mrs. Chapman desired him to get
ready at once for the operation, which he begged her to defer as
he was in such a heat. She replied that he must be inoculated that
very day, Tuesday, or remain until the following week, for Tuesday
was her lucky day. The poor fellow allowed himself to be persuaded,
and was then and there inoculated: severe smallpox ensued, and he
died.[58]
Thus was inoculation revived and established, and smallpox with
it--established and diffused.
FOOTNOTES:
[52] _Medical Works of Dr. Mead_, Vol. ii. p. 146. Edinburgh ed.,
1765.
[53] _Ibid._ p. 149.
[54] _A Sermon before the Governors of the Smallpox Hospital._
Isaiah lviii. 7. London, 1752; second ed., 1753.
[55] _An Analysis of Inoculation_, 2nd ed. 1761, p. 145.
[56] _Analysis of Inoculation_, p. 348.
[57] _Gentleman’s Magazine_, March, 1753.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account