The Story of a Great Delusion in a Series of Matter-of-Fact ChaptersWhite, William
History
The Story of a Great Delusion in a Series of Matter-of-Fact Chapters
White, William
Vaccination
The tendency of excess on one side is to provoke to excess on
the other, but the extravagance of these popular fables ought to
put us in love with homely matter-of-fact--wherein indeed is the
true extreme of these frantic inventions. What was the extent of
smallpox in England last century is the question. With accuracy,
we do not know. The common estimates (when not evolved from inner
consciousness) are based on the London Bills of Mortality, and
when these Bills are scrutinised we find nothing to justify the
opinion that the community was harassed and devastated by smallpox
over other ailments. In the first place, we have to remark that
the exact population of the metropolis was unknown. Some say it
was 500,000 in 1701, and others 700,000. In 1751 it was generally
reckoned at 750,000, and in 1801 it was said to be 958,863. Then
we have to consider that the increase, whatever it might be, lay
only partially within the Bills of Mortality, for several rising
quarters were outside the boundaries, and there were extensive
exemptions within. Thus, so late as 1818, we find Dr. Burrows
writing--
The parishes of Marylebone, Pancras, Chelsea, Kensington, and
Paddington, now forming an integral part of the metropolis, and
containing a population of 160,000 are not within the Bills of
Mortality, and make no returns. Neither are there any returns
from St. Paul’s Cathedral, Westminster Abbey, the Temple Church,
the Rolls and Lincoln’s Inn Chapels, the Chapter House, the Tower
Church, and various other places of worship of the Established
Church. Besides, neither Dissenters, Papists or Jews who have
burying places of their own, are included in the Bills. Many of
the wealthier classes when they die are removed for interment
into the country; nor do they appear in the Bills.
With omissions so serious, the Bills are obviously worth little as
registers of the number of deaths in any year in London; and when
we inquire how far they may be trusted as indicating the relative
prevalence of certain forms of disease, we find them equally
questionable. Dr. Burrows thus describes the method by which the
causes of death were ascertained--
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account