The Story of a Siberian Exile; Followed by a Narrative of Recent Events in PolandPiotrowski, Rufin
History
The Story of a Siberian Exile; Followed by a Narrative of Recent Events in Poland
Piotrowski, Rufin
Exiles -- Russia (Federation) -- Siberia; Polish question; Prisons -- Russia (Federation) -- Siberia
Still more curious was the sort of universal disavowal made of the
partition of Poland, at the moment in which it was announced as a
new public right. M. de Talleyrand, the representative of the French
king, called it ‘the prelude to European convulsions;’ and of all
the questions that were to come before the Congress, he considered
the Polish one to be ‘the first, the greatest, the most eminently
European, and, beyond comparison, before all the others in importance.’
The Emperor Alexander of Russia, professing himself the renovator of
Poland, was actuated either by ambition or by the vanity of appearing
as a liberal prince, and, doubtless, also by sentiments of generosity;
but this renovation offered itself to his mind under the shape of a
kingdom which should be a feudatory of the Russian crown, while it
still preserved the integrity of Poland. Poland was a subject of
remorse to Europe, and she inspired respect, without having strength
enough to make herself truly and really respected. Hence the strange
combinations adopted by the Congress of Vienna, which (while it
delivered over the provinces of Poland to Austria, to Russia, and
to Prussia) multiplied at the same time protecting guarantees, and
laboured to maintain a national link between the different parts, by
assuring to them a certain autonomy, as if the future could be secured
by abandoning the present.
From one point of view, nothing can be stranger than the organised
_whole_, of which the scattered elements are to be found in the final
act of Vienna, and in the separate proceedings between Russia, Prussia,
and Austria, under the sanction of Europe. In Galicia, Cracow, escaping
the general shipwreck, is constituted ‘for all time coming’ (_à
perpétuité_) a free, neutral and independent town. The transformation
of the Grand Duchy of Warsaw into the kingdom of Poland, under the
Russian crown, leaves the name of the country still diplomatically
existing, and it leaves it also as the nucleus of reconstruction, the
centre of attraction. The Prussian division gets the name of Grand
Duchy of Posen, that it may preserve a distinct character in the
whole monarchy of Frederick II.; and the frontier on the Prussian
side is defined, as well as on the Russian border. Finally (and here
is the origin of the great debate in the eyes of diplomatic Europe),
the three powers engage themselves, by their act at Vienna, to give
to the Poles, their respective subjects, ‘representation and such
national institutions, arranged according to their modes of political
existence, as each of the governments shall judge to be useful;’ while,
in order better to define the sense and meaning of these guaranteed
institutions, the separate treaties add that these are intended to
secure to the Poles ‘the preservation of their nationality.’
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account