The Story of Anna Kingsford and Edward Maitland and of the new Gospel of InterpretationMaitland, Edward
Religion
The Story of Anna Kingsford and Edward Maitland and of the new Gospel of Interpretation
Maitland, Edward
Kingsford, Anna Bonus, 1846-1888; Mysticism
This doctrine of a multiplicity of earth-lives is implicit and sometimes
explicit in the Bible. The notion that the Hebrews had no belief in a
future state because of the failure of commentators to discover it in
their Scriptures, is altogether futile. The permanence of the Ego was a
matter of course with them, saving only the Sadducees. And the Bible
contemplates the persistence of the individual soul through all the
manifold stages of its evolution, from the "Adam" stage to the "Christ"
stage, saying, as by St Paul, "As in Adam all die, so in Christ shall
all be made alive." But the Christ insisted on by him was not He Who is
"after the flesh," not the man Jesus, who was but the vehicle of the
Christ, but the Christ within both Jesus and all other regenerate men.
For, as a highly illuminated follower of the Gnosis, St Paul was one who
"after the way which" his orthodox accusers "called heresy, worshipped
the God of his fathers, believing all things which are according to the
law, and are written in the prophets." Rejecting the doctrine of
regeneration, and with it that of reincarnation, in favour of
substitution, the orthodoxy which claims to be Christianity has
practically rejected both the doctrine of St Paul and that of Jesus as
declared to Nicodemus. And, as St Paul implies, the "mystery of
iniquity" was working even already in his days to annul the gospel of
Christ by substituting Jesus as the object of worship, and His physical
blood-shedding as the means of salvation. And Christendom, yielding to
sacerdotal dictation, has to this day accepted a doctrine which at once
dishonours God and robs men of their equal divine potentialities with
Jesus, thus preferring Barabbas. Professing to rest its faith on the
Bible, it has accepted the presentation of religion which the Bible
persistently condemns, that of the priests, and rejected that on which
the Bible emphatically insists, that of the prophets. That St Paul
employed sacerdotal modes of expression was in order to spiritualise
them. He was a mystic of mystics.
Nevertheless the dogmas of the Church contain the truth, but this is not
as the Church has propounded them. And--to cite two crucial
instances--so far from the Church's supreme dogmas, the Immaculate
Conception and the Assumption of the Blessed Virgin, having any personal
or physical reference, they are prophecies of the method of redemption
for every individual soul. For, as the New Gospel of Interpretation
explicitly declares, restoring the Gnosis persistently rejected by the
builders of the orthodoxies,
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account