The story of Don Miff : $b as told by his friend John Bouche Whacker: a symphony of lifeDabney, Virginius
History
The story of Don Miff : $b as told by his friend John Bouche Whacker: a symphony of life
Dabney, Virginius
Richmond (Va.) -- Fiction; United States -- History -- Civil War, 1861-1865 -- Fiction
How and by how many cooks this broth has been brewed, our patrons have
already been duly informed. Up to this point the firm, as a firm, has
been responsible for everything that has been written; for though our
Mr. Whacker, having the pen of a ready writer, has had the task of
arranging our wares in show-cases, our silent partners have furnished
the bulk of said wares. And we desire to say to the public that our
joint labors have been, thus far, carried forward most joyously, and
with perfect harmony.
Save only in one particular.
Our female associate has been grumbling, from the very first, at the
treatment that Love has received at the hands of our Mr. Whacker. She
has again and again protested against what she calls the mocking touches
of his pencil, when he would portray that passion which is so tender,
and yet hath power to move the world. He, on his side, has defended his
handiwork, if not with success, at least with a certain manly vigor,
having observed more than once that he could not for the life of him get
it into his head how it could be High Art to make your heroes say in a
book what a Christian would be hanged before he would say, or be
overheard saying, at least, in real life; adding, with a tartness born
of his wrangles at the Bar, that it passed his comprehension why authors
should be at the pains of causing imaginary beings to make fools of
themselves, when nature had served so many real ones that turn. In
reply, our Alice said that, if that were so, they were but holding the
mirror up to nature; a retort that seemed to dispose of our legal
brother; and so our Alice was encouraged to go on and add (using the
bluntness of a friend) that all this talk about love-making being an
exhibition of an aggravated type of idiocy was, to use the mildest name,
the merest affectation, and could have originated only in the brain of a
sore-headed old bachelor, who is forever talking of marrying, but who
has not the vaguest conception of what love really means. Our Charley,
meanwhile, would only smoke and chuckle and chuckle and smoke, when we
asked for his vote to end our controversy; and as his smoke-wreaths were
perfectly symmetrical, inclining neither this way nor that, and as he
chuckled on both sides of him, neither of us belligerents had the least
pretext for claiming the victory. Yet, in the end, it was he who closed
our debate.
“Jack-Whack,” said he (ever judicious), “turn about is fair play.
Suppose we let Alice write this fifty-first chapter. Let it be hers
entirely, and let her acknowledge it as such, while you may disown it.”
To this we are all agreed. In testimony whereof we have hereunto, etc.,
etc., etc.
Charles Frobisher. [Seal.]
Alice Ditto. [Seal.]
John Bouche Whacker. [Seal.✻]
[✻_Porpoise. Ha! ha! ha!_]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account