at this day has hundreds of ships engaged in the local and export
trade. His most glorious work, however, was the regulation of the
Theiss, resulting, in the course of time, in the reclaiming of a
marshy territory containing one hundred and fifty square miles, and
turning it into a rich and fertile soil. His mind was teeming, besides,
with various schemes looking to the building of railways, and to the
promotion of commerce and industry; but all these various undertakings
were marked by the same steady spirit of patriotic endeavor.
For fifteen years, up to 1840, the popularity of Széchenyi had gone
on increasing throughout the country, and his name was cherished by
every good patriot in the land. About this time, however, the great
statesman was destined to come into collision with a man who was his
peer in genius and abilities. The two patriots were representatives
of different methods, and in the contest produced by the shock of
antagonistic tendencies Széchenyi was compelled to yield to Louis
Kossuth, his younger rival. Although there was no material difference
between their aims, for both wished to see their country great, free,
constitutionally governed, prosperous, and advanced in civilization,
yet in the ways and means employed by them to attain that aim they
were diametrically opposed to each other. Széchenyi, who descended
from a family of ancient and aristocratic lineage, and presented
himself to the nation with connections reaching up into the highest
circles of the court, with the lustre of his ancient name, and with
his immense fortune, wished to secure the happiness of his country by
quite different methods from those adopted by Louis Kossuth, a child
of the people, who, although he was a nobleman by birth, yet belonged
to that poorer class of gentry who support themselves by their own
exertions, and who, in Hungary, are destined to fulfil the mission of
the citizen-classes of other countries. It is from these classes of the
gentry that are, for the most part, recruited the tradespeople, the
smaller landowners, professional men, writers, subordinate officials,
lawyers, physicians, clergymen, teachers, and professors. By virtue
of their nobility, it is true, they belonged to the privileged
class of the country, and were not subjected to the humiliations
of the oppressed peasantry, yet they had to earn a living by their
own work, and were therefore not only accessible to, but were ready
enthusiastically to receive, the lofty message of liberty and equality
which the French Revolution of 1830 began to proclaim anew throughout
all Europe. These doctrines formed a sharp contrast to the views of
Count Stephen Széchenyi, views which, owing to the social position of
the man who held them, were not devoid of a certain aristocratic tinge,
and according to which the most important part in the regeneration
of the Hungarian nation was assigned to the aristocracy. It was a
part, however, which the Hungarian aristocracy was itself by no means
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account