World history; World history -- Juvenile literature
The Stuarts, who succeeded the Tudors, were “foreigners” in England.
They do not seem to have appreciated or understood this fact. The
native house of Tudor could steal a horse, but the “foreign” Stuarts
were not allowed to look at the bridle without causing great popular
disapproval. Old Queen Bess had ruled her domains very much as she
pleased. In general however, she had always followed a policy which
meant money in the pocket of the honest (and otherwise) British
merchants. Hence the Queen had been always assured of the wholehearted
support of her grateful people. And small liberties taken with some of
the rights and prerogatives of Parliament were gladly overlooked for
the ulterior benefits which were derived from her Majesty’s strong and
successful foreign policies.
Outwardly King James continued the same policy. But he lacked that
personal enthusiasm which had been so very typical of his great
predecessor. Foreign commerce continued to be encouraged. The Catholics
were not granted any liberties. But when Spain smiled pleasantly upon
England in an effort to establish peaceful relations, James was seen to
smile back. The majority of the English people did not like this, but
James was their King and they kept quiet.
Soon there were other causes of friction. King James and his son,
Charles I, who succeeded him in the year 1625 both firmly believed in
the principle of their “divine right” to administer their realm as
they thought fit without consulting the wishes of their subjects. The
idea was not new. The Popes, who in more than one way had been the
successors of the Roman Emperors (or rather of the Roman Imperial ideal
of a single and undivided state covering the entire known world), had
always regarded themselves and had been publicly recognised as the
“Vice-Regents of Christ upon Earth.” No one questioned the right of
God to rule the world as He saw fit. As a natural result, few ventured
to doubt the right of the divine “Vice-Regent” to do the same thing
and to demand the obedience of the masses because he was the direct
representative of the Absolute Ruler of the Universe and responsible
only to Almighty God.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account