World history; World history -- Juvenile literature
William, like most English sovereigns before him, had chosen his
advisors from among all parties. But with the increased strength of
Parliament, he had found it impossible to direct the politics of the
country with the help of the Tories while the Whigs had a majority
in the house of Commons. Therefore the Tories had been dismissed and
the Cabinet Council had been composed entirely of Whigs. A few years
later when the Whigs lost their power in the House of Commons, the
king, for the sake of convenience, was obliged to look for his support
among the leading Tories. Until his death in 1702, William was too
busy fighting Louis of France to bother much about the government
of England. Practically all important affairs had been left to his
Cabinet Council. When William’s sister-in-law, Anne, succeeded him in
1702 this condition of affairs continued. When she died in 1714 (and
unfortunately not a single one of her seventeen children survived her)
the throne went to George I of the House of Hanover, the son of Sophie,
grand-daughter of James I.
This somewhat rustic monarch, who never learned a word of English,
was entirely lost in the complicated mazes of England’s political
arrangements. He left everything to his Cabinet Council and kept away
from their meetings, which bored him as he did not understand a single
sentence. In this way the Cabinet got into the habit of ruling England
and Scotland (whose Parliament had been joined to that of England in
1707) without bothering the King, who was apt to spend a great deal of
his time on the continent.
During the reign of George I and George II, a succession of great
Whigs (of whom one, Sir Robert Walpole, held office for twenty-one
years) formed the Cabinet Council of the King. Their leader was finally
recognised as the official leader not only of the actual Cabinet
but also of the majority party in power in Parliament. The attempts
of George III to take matters into his own hands and not to leave
the actual business of government to his Cabinet were so disastrous
that they were never repeated. And from the earliest years of the
eighteenth century on, England enjoyed representative government, with
a responsible ministry which conducted the affairs of the land.
To be quite true, this government did not represent all classes of
society. Less than one man in a dozen had the right to vote. But it
was the foundation for the modern representative form of government.
In a quiet and orderly fashion it took the power away from the King
and placed it in the hands of an ever increasing number of popular
representatives. It did not bring the millennium to England, but it
saved that country from most of the revolutionary outbreaks which
proved so disastrous to the European continent in the eighteenth and
nineteenth centuries.
THE BALANCE OF POWER
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account