World history; World history -- Juvenile literature
The North remained obdurate and the South would not give in. When
it appeared impossible to reach a compromise, the southern states
threatened to leave the Union. It was a most dangerous point in the
history of the Union. Many things “might” have happened. That they did
not happen was the work of a very great and very good man.
On the sixth of November of the year 1860, Abraham Lincoln, an Illinois
lawyer, and a man who had made his own intellectual fortune, had been
elected president by the Republicans who were very strong in the
anti-slavery states. He knew the evils of human bondage at first hand
and his shrewd common-sense told him that there was no room on the
northern continent for two rival nations. When a number of southern
states seceded and formed the “Confederate States of America,” Lincoln
accepted the challenge. The Northern states were called upon for
volunteers. Hundreds of thousands of young men responded with eager
enthusiasm and there followed four years of bitter civil war. The
South, better prepared and following the brilliant leadership of Lee
and Jackson, repeatedly defeated the armies of the North. Then the
economic strength of New England and the West began to tell. An unknown
officer by the name of Grant arose from obscurity and became the
Charles Martel of the great slave war. Without interruption he hammered
his mighty blows upon the crumbling defences of the South. Early in the
year 1863, President Lincoln issued his “Emancipation Proclamation”
which set all slaves free. In April of the year 1865 Lee surrendered
the last of his brave armies at Appomattox. A few days later, President
Lincoln was murdered by a lunatic. But his work was done. With the
exception of Cuba which was still under Spanish domination, slavery
had come to an end in every part of the civilised world.
But while the black man was enjoying an increasing amount of liberty,
the “free” workmen of Europe did not fare quite so well. Indeed, it
is a matter of surprise to many contemporary writers and observers
that the masses of workmen (the so-called proletariat) did not die out
from sheer misery. They lived in dirty houses situated in miserable
parts of the slums. They ate bad food. They received just enough
schooling to fit them for their tasks. In case of death or an accident,
their families were not provided for. But the brewery and distillery
interests, (who could exercise great influence upon the Legislature,)
encouraged them to forget their woes by offering them unlimited
quantities of whisky and gin at very cheap rates.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account