World history; World history -- Juvenile literature
Thereafter the Romans enjoyed one great advantage over the Greeks. They
managed the affairs of their country without making too many speeches.
They were less imaginative than the Greeks and they preferred an ounce
of action to a pound of words. They understood the tendency of the
multitude (the “plebs,” as the assemblage of free citizens was called)
only too well to waste valuable time upon mere talk. They therefore
placed the actual business of running the city into the hands of two
“consuls” who were assisted by a council of Elders, called the Senate
(because the word “senex” means an old man). As a matter of custom and
practical advantage the senators were elected from the nobility. But
their power had been strictly defined.
Rome at one time had passed through the same sort of struggle between
the poor and the rich which had forced Athens to adopt the laws of
Draco and Solon. In Rome this conflict had occurred in the fifth
century B.C. As a result the freemen had obtained a written code of
laws which protected them against the despotism of the aristocratic
judges by the institution of the “Tribune.” These Tribunes were
city-magistrates, elected by the freemen. They had the right to protect
any citizen against those actions of the government officials which
were thought to be unjust. A consul had the right to condemn a man to
death, but if the case had not been absolutely proved the Tribune could
interfere and save the poor fellow’s life.
But when I use the word Rome, I seem to refer to a little city of a few
thousand inhabitants. And the real strength of Rome lay in the country
districts outside her walls. And it was in the government of these
outlying provinces that Rome at an early age showed her wonderful gift
as a colonising power.
In very early times Rome had been the only strongly fortified city
in central Italy, but it had always offered a hospitable refuge
to other Latin tribes who happened to be in danger of attack. The
Latin neighbours had recognised the advantages of a close union with
such a powerful friend and they had tried to find a basis for some
sort of defensive and offensive alliance. Other nations, Egyptians,
Babylonians, Phœnicians, even Greeks, would have insisted upon a treaty
of submission on the part of the “barbarians.” The Romans did nothing
of the sort. They gave the “outsider” a chance to become partners in a
common “res publica”—or common-wealth.
“You want to join us,” they said. “Very well, go ahead and join. We
shall treat you as if you were full-fledged citizens of Rome. In return
for this privilege we expect you to fight for our city, the mother of
us all, whenever it shall be necessary.”
The “outsider” appreciated this generosity and he showed his gratitude
by his unswerving loyalty.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account