World history; World history -- Juvenile literature
In the fifteenth century the kings once more became strong enough
to exercise those powers which belonged to them because they were
“anointed of God.” Then the feudal knights lost their former
independence. Reduced to the rank of country squires, they no longer
filled a need and soon they became a nuisance. But Europe would have
perished without the “feudal system” of the dark ages. There were
many bad knights as there are many bad people to-day. But generally
speaking, the rough-fisted barons of the twelfth and thirteenth
century were hard-working administrators who rendered a most useful
service to the cause of progress. During that era the noble torch of
learning and art which had illuminated the world of the Egyptians and
the Greeks and the Romans was burning very low. Without the knights
and their good friends, the monks, civilisation would have been
extinguished entirely, and the human race would have been forced to
begin once more where the cave-man had left off.
CHIVALRY
CHIVALRY
It was quite natural that the professional fighting-men of the Middle
Ages should try to establish some sort of organisation for their mutual
benefit and protection. Out of this need for close organisation,
Knighthood or Chivalry was born.
We know very little about the origins of Knighthood. But as the system
developed, it gave the world something which it needed very badly—a
definite rule of conduct which softened the barbarous customs of that
day and made life more livable than it had been during the five hundred
years of the Dark Ages. It was not an easy task to civilise the rough
frontiers-men who had spent most of their time fighting Mohammedans
and Huns and Norsemen. Often they were guilty of back-sliding, and
having vowed all sorts of oaths about mercy and charity in the morning,
they would murder all their prisoners before evening. But progress is
ever the result of slow and ceaseless labour, and finally the most
unscrupulous of knights was forced to obey the rules of his “class” or
suffer the consequences.
These rules were different in the various parts of Europe, but they all
made much of “service” and “loyalty to duty.” The Middle Ages regarded
service as something very noble and beautiful. It was no disgrace to
be a servant, provided you were a good servant and did not slacken on
the job. As for loyalty, at a time when life depended upon the faithful
performance of many unpleasant duties, it was the chief virtue of the
fighting man.
A young knight therefore was asked to swear that he would be faithful
as a servant to God and as a servant to his King. Furthermore, he
promised to be generous to those whose need was greater than his own.
He pledged his word that he would be humble in his personal behaviour
and would never boast of his own accomplishments and that he would
be a friend of all those who suffered, (with the exception of the
Mohammedans, whom he was expected to kill on sight).
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account