World history; World history -- Juvenile literature
The average man of the Middle Ages lived a very simple and uneventful
life. Even if he was a free citizen, able to come and go at will, he
rarely left his own neighbourhood. There were no printed books and only
a few manuscripts. Here and there, a small band of industrious monks
taught reading and writing and some arithmetic. But science and history
and geography lay buried beneath the ruins of Greece and Rome.
Whatever people knew about the past they had learned by listening
to stories and legends. Such information, which goes from father to
son, is often slightly incorrect in details, but it will preserve the
main facts of history with astonishing accuracy. After more than two
thousand years, the mothers of India still frighten their naughty
children by telling them that “Iskander will get them,” and Iskander
is none other than Alexander the Great, who visited India in the year
330 before the birth of Christ, but whose story has lived through all
these ages.
The people of the early Middle Ages never saw a text-book of Roman
history. They were ignorant of many things which every school-boy
to-day knows before he has entered the third grade. But the Roman
Empire, which is merely a name to you, was to them something very
much alive. They felt it. They willingly recognised the Pope as their
spiritual leader because he lived in Rome and represented the idea
of the Roman super-power. And they were profoundly grateful when
Charlemagne, and afterwards Otto the Great, revived the idea of a
world-empire and created the Holy Roman Empire, that the world might
again be as it always had been.
But the fact that there were two different heirs to the Roman tradition
placed the faithful burghers of the Middle Ages in a difficult
position. The theory behind the mediæval political system was both
sound and simple. While the worldly master (the emperor) looked after
the physical well-being of his subjects, the spiritual master (the
Pope) guarded their souls.
In practice, however, the system worked very badly. The Emperor
invariably tried to interfere with the affairs of the church and
the Pope retaliated and told the Emperor how he should rule his
domains. Then they told each other to mind their own business in very
unceremonious language and the inevitable end was war.
Under those circumstances, what were the people to do? A good Christian
obeyed both the Pope and his King. But the Pope and the Emperor were
enemies. Which side should a dutiful subject and an equally dutiful
Christian take?
It was never easy to give the correct answer. When the Emperor happened
to be a man of energy and was sufficiently well provided with money to
organise an army, he was very apt to cross the Alps and march on Rome,
besiege the Pope in his own palace if need be, and force His Holiness
to obey the imperial instructions or suffer the consequences.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account