The Story of NewfoundlandBirkenhead, Frederick Edwin Smith, Earl of
History
The Story of Newfoundland
Birkenhead, Frederick Edwin Smith, Earl of
America -- Discovery and exploration -- British; Newfoundland and Labrador -- History
9. That they have acted thus in what they believe to be the
best interests of the colony I have no reason to doubt; but,
whether or not it is the case, as they allege, that the
intolerable burden of the Public Debt, and the position in
which the colony was left by the contract of 1893, rendered
this sacrifice inevitable, the fact that the colony, after
more than forty years of self-government, should have to
resort to such a step is greatly to be regretted.
10. I have to request that in communicating this despatch to
your Ministers you will inform them that it is my wish that it
may be published in the _Gazette_.
I have, etc.,
J. CHAMBERLAIN.
Some of the inferences set forth in the Colonial Secretary's lucid
letter were questioned by the Newfoundland Government, but
substantially his conclusions were not assailed. The decision of the
Imperial Government by no means stayed the voice of local agitation,
and the stream of petitions continued to grow. In a further letter to
Governor Murray, dated December 5th, 1898, Mr Chamberlain laid down
the great constitutional doctrine which is the Magna Charta of Greater
Britain. Every student of colonial politics should be familiar with
these passages:
"The right to complete and unfettered control over financial policy
and arrangements is essential to self-government, and has been
invariably acknowledged and respected by Her Majesty's Government, and
jealously guarded by the colonies. The Colonial Government and
Legislature are solely responsible for the management of its finances
to the people of the colony, and unless Imperial interests of grave
importance were imperilled, the intervention of Her Majesty's
Government in such matters would be an unwarrantable intrusion and a
breach of the charter of the colony.
"It is nowhere alleged that the interests of any other part of the
Empire are involved, or that the Act is any way repugnant to Imperial
legislation. It is asserted, indeed, that the contract disposes of
assets of the colony over which its creditors in this country have an
equitable, if not a legal claim; but, apart from the fact that the
assets in question are mainly potential, and that the security of the
colonial debt is its general revenue and not any particular property
or assets, I cannot admit that the creditors of the colony have any
right to claim the interference of Her Majesty's Government in this
matter. It is on the faith of the Colonial Government and Legislature
that they have advanced their money, and it is to them that they must
appeal if they consider themselves damnified.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account