World War, 1914-1918 -- Naval operations -- Submarine
This was early in the war, when things had not settled down and the
minefields in the Bight were few. More than one boat then had dived
right up to the entrance of Schillig Roads and had looked longingly at
the guardship lying just out of range across the shoals. E boats
treated destroyers with contempt, and used to remain on the surface in
their presence to the last possible moment. There are many rumours of
strange incidents of 1914 and 1915 which did not reach despatches, such
as wireless signals to Heligoland suggesting that the enemy ships
should come out and give our boats a chance, or of boats firing a
succession of different coloured lights off the mouth of the Ems in the
hope of enticing something out to see what it was all about. If the
wireless story is not true it is at any rate a sound idea. We did not
produce any propaganda department till much later, or they might have
developed it, for such signals would have been very suggestive when
intercepted by neutral wireless stations. The state of defence of the
Bight changed from 1914, when our boats played about in it as they
pleased, and even cruisers could come in and actually sight Heligoland,
to the 1915 stage, when boats had to work inside, diving all day in the
midst of enemy patrol vessels and getting their batteries charged in
the intervals between alarms at night. Then the minefields began to
thicken, and the submarine patrol line was brought gradually back to
the longitude of Borkum. Then our minefields began to cluster around
those the enemy had laid, and the patrols eventually took up a curved
line from Terschelling across the mouth of the Bight to Hiorn's Reef
and the Vyl Light, and remained there, except for occasional
examination trips up to the enemy harbours and for the frequent visits
of our mine-laying submarines (which used to drop their cargoes
wherever they were most likely to have full effect). This moving back
of the patrol line was not due to the increase of the Bight minefields
alone: the realisation of the use of the submarine as a scout and the
recognition of the fact that for our fleet the wireless in the
submarines was of more strategic use than were the torpedoes, altered
the policy by which the boats were stationed. A tactical victory may be
useful, but it is a strategical victory that wins a war, and this fact
was at the base of our policy at sea. The enemy seems never to have
understood what sea-strategy meant, although his tactics were sound
enough. It is a curious thing to note how the _rôle_ of the
submarine changed during the war. The boats of both sides started by
being ordinary anti-warship craft, taking a chance when they could.
Gradually our boats became outer-line scouts (with exceptions), and the
U-boats (with exceptions) became exclusively commerce-destroyers. At
present anti-submarine work has advanced so far that it would be a rash
nation which would endeavour to obtain a victory over another by a
submarine force alone.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account