The Story of the Airship (Non-rigid): A Study of One of America's Lesser Known Defense WeaponsAllen, Hugh
History
The Story of the Airship (Non-rigid): A Study of One of America's Lesser Known Defense Weapons
Allen, Hugh
Military airships -- United States
Mention airships and most people will immediately raise the question of
vulnerability.
Large, slow moving, a tempting target, airships could be shot out of the
sky by ship or shore guns, or by hostile airplane fire, it is argued,
almost as easily as a dinner guest touching his cigaret to a toy
balloon.
And this is probably true, with reservations, if enemy ships or
anti-aircraft batteries or planes were around. But the airship,
non-rigid, has no more business in such areas than a British airplane
carrier would have to drop anchor in Hamburg harbor.
It was because of the imminence of attack from sea or shore or air that
neither England nor Germany used airships in the present war,
particularly since they would have to use the inflammable hydrogen gas.
It was because such attack on American airships from any of these three
sources was much less likely—and that we have helium gas, which does not
burn—that this country is using them.
Their chief field of operations is not off the enemy’s coasts but our
own, along that broad ribbon of waters used by our coastwise shipping,
an area roughly marked in the Atlantic by the 100 fathom curve, the
favorite fishing grounds of enemy submarines. Thousands of miles of blue
water, not the narrow lanes of the North Sea or British Channel are
between them and the shore guns of an enemy.
An enemy fleet, though likelihood of this seems remote, might penetrate
those coast waters in attempted invasion, attack the blimps with
anti-aircraft fire. But such an enemy, arriving in force, would have
either to knock out our Atlantic fleet, or slip past it in surprise
attempt. In the remote later contingency, the information relayed back
by airship radio that the enemy was moving in would be worth losing
airships or any other craft, to get.
The third hypothesis, attack by airplane, is also conceivable. But if
long-ranging enemy planes were able to get that close to our shores
they’d have more important business in hand than wasting time and powder
on a helium bubble bobbing in the air, 10,000 feet below—which in any
event would already have radioed the news ashore.
In the fairly remote contingency that the airplane did choose to attack
the blimp, it would find the position of that moving target, flying at
an indeterminate distance below, much more difficult to calculate than a
fixed target ashore, no easy thing to drop bombs on.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account