I into I and J, and VV or UV into double U = W. The Anglo-Saxon, which
appears to be partly Roman and partly Irish in origin, had borrowed two
useful characters from the Runic, Þ = w, named _wen_, and Þ = th, named
_thorn_, which for a time formed part of the English alphabet. The
_thorn_ has been revived of late, as a bastard archaic, in the printing
of _the_ as _y^e_, with consequent mispronunciation of that word by
those who see it thus changed. Both Y and Z were late importations from
the Greek into the Latin, being used only in Greek loan-words to denote
sounds peculiar to the Greek; hence, as the most recent arrivals, their
appearance at the end of the alphabet. Some of our letters are of
little use; K makes C superfluous, and Q and X are of no more service
to us than they were to the Romans. So that, for practical purposes,
we have only twenty-three letters wherewith to indicate at least
thirty-two sounds. Thus our alphabet, like our spelling (which is ever
at war with our pronunciation, to the bewilderment of school children
and foreigners), is what it is from the lack of any consistent rule.
Nevertheless, so workable a set of signs has secured a footing which,
made firmer by the art of printing, is not likely to be disturbed by
any processes of phonetic change which mark the course of speech. To
that art of printing is also due those modifications in handwriting
which distinguish the penmanship of past and present times. As has been
seen, while Germany remained in fetters to the eye-distracting Black
letter, we freed ourselves by adoption of the clear Roman type; hence
the disappearance, save in legal documents and a few show art-books,
of the cramped hand which prevailed down to the sixteenth century.
So the handwriting of to-day (good, bad, and indifferent, as the
personal equation of each one of us shapes it), which we learned at
school through the stages of "pot-hooks and hangers" to the grandest
flourishes of copy-book "maxims," is derived from the same source as
the printed alphabet.
[Illustration: GENEALOGY OF THE ENGLISH ALPHABET.]
CHAPTER XI
RUNES AND OGAMS
The Runic alphabet originated among the Scandinavians, who probably
adapted it from some other script, since no traces of any pictographic
characters whence it may have been derived have been found. Some
scholars hold that it is derived from the "Phœnician" alphabet; others
say that it comes from the Latin. Canon Taylor has a definite theory
that it is a degraded form of the Greek alphabet; for in the sixth
century B.C. the Goths swarmed in the region south of the
Baltic and east of the Vistula, and in their trading relations with
Greek colonists north of the Black Sea may readily have obtained a
knowledge of the Greek alphabet. The question, however, of origin
remains, and is likely to remain, unsettled.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account