Book of Mormon; Latter Day Saint churches -- Doctrines; Latter Day Saints
The inquiry will naturally arise, as a result of these suggestions:
In what portion of the South American continent lay the home
of the Nephites in the days of Mosiah? This cannot be answered
authoritatively. We are nowhere told its exact situation. Still, there
are many references in the Book of Mormon from which we can judge, to
some extent, of its location. Elder Orson Pratt suggests that it was
in the country we now call Ecuador. The writer entirely agrees with
Elder Pratt's suggestion. Other brethren have placed it considerably
farther south; but in our reading of the Book of Mormon we have found
no evidence to confirm their suppositions, but much to contradict them.
We believe that the lands occupied by the Nephites before they went
down into the land of Zarahemla were situated among the table lands or
high valleys of the Andes, much as Utah is located in the bosom of the
Rocky Mountains and parallel chains. For these reasons:
First:--They were lands rich in minerals, which all through the American
continents are found most abundantly in mountain regions. We may (so
far as mineral proximity is concerned) compare the country east of this
portion of the Andes--the unexplored, alluvial silvas of the Amazon--to
the great plains or prairies east of the Rocky Mountains. These silvas,
stretching from the Andes to the Atlantic, we regard as the great
wilderness south of Zarahemla so often spoken of in the annals of the
Judges.
Secondly, the climate of the torrid lowlands, almost directly under
the equator, would be intolerable for its heat, and deadly in its
humidity; while the country in the high valleys and table lands would
be excellently adapted to human life, especially (we may presume)
before the great upheavals and convulsions that marked the death of
the Redeemer. As the Nephites spread over the country they located in
regions where fevers were common, possibly in those parts rendered
unhealthy by the overflowing of the rivers, which, when they receded,
left large bodies of stagnant water covering the surface of the ground
for the greater portion of the year.
It is also probable that in their journeys the Nephites would follow
the most available route, rather than plunge into the dense, untrodden,
primeval forests of the wilderness; the home of all manner of savage
animals, venomous snakes and poisonous reptiles; where a road would
have to be cut every foot of the way through the most luxuriant and
gigantic tropical vegetation to be found on the face of the globe.
Therefore we regard its accessibility as another reason for believing
that the Nephites did not leave the great backbone of the continent to
descend into the unexplored depths of the region whose character they
aptly sum up in the one word, wilderness.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account