The Story of the "Britannia": The training ship for naval cadets. With some account of previous methods of naval education, and of the new scheme of 1903.Statham, Edward Phillips
History
The Story of the "Britannia": The training ship for naval cadets. With some account of previous methods of naval education, and of the new scheme of 1903.
Statham, Edward Phillips
Britannia (Ship); Great Britain. Royal Navy; Naval education -- Great Britain
One cadet, it was stated, compelled young Lloyd to sing in the
messroom, contrary to regulations, whereby he incurred punishment;
another kicked and knocked him down without provocation; and on more
than one occasion he was compelled to give up his pocket money under
threats of personal violence. His fear of being beaten by the cadets
was greater than his fear of punishment by the authorities, etc.
Captain Graham replies that he and his officers will investigate the
matter when the cadets return from leave.
Eventually, however, the Admiralty appointed a committee, presided
over by Admiral Willes, to inquire into the matter, on board the
_Britannia_, with the result that Mr. Lloyd was informed that there
was not sufficient ground for these charges. He applied for the
minutes of the inquiry, and was refused; but the Admiralty upheld him
in deprecating the application of the term "worthless" to his son, in
Captain Graham's first letter.
There appears to be little doubt that there was some bullying of a
somewhat gross nature at this time; like all other large schools, the
_Britannia_ has suffered from occasional outbreaks of this kind,
probably instigated as a rule by one or two big boys; and as the small
boys are afraid to report it, there is often some difficulty in
convicting the culprits.
On June 18th, 1877, an attack was made by Mr. Shaw Lefevre in the
House of Commons on the regulations of 1875, when, as has been
described, competition was abolished as a result of the report of the
committee.
[Illustration: THE ROYAL CADETS AT SEAMANSHIP.
_Photo: W. & D. Downey, Ebury St., S.W._]
This gentleman maintained that the substitution of a test examination
for competition was an unmixed evil; that a far better class of boys
was obtained under the latter system: and quoted Lord Macaulay, who
held that competition automatically preserves a high standard.
Mr. Childers, supporting Mr. Shaw Lefevre, said that when he became
First Lord of the Admiralty (in 1869) his predecessor, Mr. Corry,
urged him to reform the _Britannia_, which he thought was in a bad
state; and Mr. Childers further states that, although competition was
abolished on the recommendation of the committee of 1874, ten of the
witnesses were in favour of competition, and only three against it;
which is certainly not borne out by the report.
[Illustration: PRINCE ALBERT VICTOR.
_Photo: Smale & Son, Dartmouth._]
Mr. Ward Hunt, the First Lord, in replying, admitted that the test, as
first laid down, was too easy, but it had since been made rather more
stringent. He does not, however, give any reason for doing away with
competition, other than on the score of injurious brain work; but
probably Admiral Sir A. Cooper Key's remark when before the Commission
sums up the matter pretty correctly; he says that he disapproves of
competition for boys so young, but, as the number of applications
exceeds so greatly the number of vacancies, he thinks it is
inevitable.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account