But, in addition, there is one other point to be considered in thinking
of what was done in past wars, and so examining if similar things
could be done in the future. Would the bombardment of open, or feebly
defended, coast towns be permitted? Would that old “harassing” side
of war, without any other end beyond that of harassing, be considered
justifiable now? There is a certain _general_ and no longer _local_
public opinion to be considered nowadays, and much that was done when
the nineteenth century was young will be very possibly looked on as
barbarous and unnecessary when another century dawns.
Lastly, the means of local defence have also largely increased. It is
common to see, as at Havana, how frequently forts and batteries were
fully silenced by the fire from the fleet, whose guns were certainly
not of great power. But coast batteries are now more scientifically
and powerfully built, and mount guns quite as formidable, if not more
so, than battleships can carry. Ranges are greater, and the accuracy
of fire enormously improved, and ground mines and active torpedoes
can make situations, whence fleets could formerly best act, too
dangerous now to be occupied at all. Quick-firing and machine guns,
repeating rifles, and what not, will render boat operations practically
impossible, except at night. Such landings as those at Aboukir Bay,
etc., should be now out of the question. It may safely be surmised that
the class of operations referred to in this chapter will be less easy
of execution in the future than when Guadaloupe was taken.
But one thing is clearly apparent in watching the story of this
combination of military and naval war. It was only as England began
to feel her strength, and, by increasing her squadrons, to have the
power of showing it, that she really began to grow to greatness. At
first the wars were local and somewhat restricted on shore, as were the
actions of the fleets. But the desire to get at France and Spain on
both sides, or all along their coast lines, led, instinctively almost,
to the capture of Gibraltar, the gateway to the Mediterranean, and next
to seize Minorca, as she did later Malta, and then Cyprus, as a base of
operations for her naval strength. Such harbours or bases are needful
always for rest, refitting, reprovisioning, and, _now_, recoaling. No
such fortified place is by itself a menace; it is only the basis of
that active menace, the sea-going fleet of battleships. Neither Malta
nor Biserta would in the least affect the destinies of the world unless
behind the shelter of their defensive works was a sea-going fleet
capable of offensive action. The defence of the fortress is purely
passive; the defence power of the fleet is, like that of cavalry,
either active or nothing. This in the last century was the use of
Minorca.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account