Peace--general peace at all events--had reigned from 1783 to 1789,
when the French Revolution broke out. With the merits or demerits of
that great struggle this story has nothing to do; but none the less
the overthrow of the monarchy of France not only created an almost
continuous condition of war for a quarter of a century, but helped most
materially to raise to the highest pitch the Continental opinion as
to the military value of Great Britain. Its naval strength throughout
that quarter of a century was most fully proved. It remained for the
stubborn fighting power of the land forces to be displayed during the
same eventful period. French anger, English panic, had dragged the
latter into open war with France, and that not without allies. All the
world began by being against the new Republic: small wonder, then, that
in her new-born freedom she turned bitterly against her world-wide
antagonists, and fought them all. That she did not fully conquer
them was largely due to one small State--England. The wealth of the
latter, even then comparatively greater than the Continent, her naval
preponderance, infinitely greater, as events proved, than that of her
antagonist, though her numerical fighting strength as compared with the
Continental powers was but small, and her insular position, made her
eventually almost the arbiter of Europe, when the great struggle drew
to an end.
As usual, the actual number of the army throughout the years from 1793
to 1808 constantly varied. The 150,000 men under arms in 1780 was
reduced to 40,000 the next year, was increased the year after to about
55,000 in Great Britain, and fell in 1784 to 18,000 at home, 12,000 in
the “Plantations,” and some 6000 in India. The provision for the latter
force was made by a new and special vote. The importance of the growing
empire in the East was being at last recognised.
The system of levying troops continued much the same. Men were enlisted
voluntarily by heavy bounties, and when that attraction failed, the
pressgang, or even the prisons, was then employed to raise recruits.
Unless disbanded at the end of a campaign, they served for life, or
till worn out; but the dawn of a short-service system appeared in 1805,
when the period of service was fixed at seventeen years.[32]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account