But Blucher, unmolested, had only difficult ground to traverse, wearied
troops to encourage, and his promise to help Wellington to keep his
energy at its highest. He was not threatened in his march. Thielemann
could hold Wavre, and so, desperately playing the bold game, he won
success. It was “_toujours l’audace_” over again. He had promised to
come with all he could bring, and he nobly fulfilled his promise. Never
was there a better leader of men in a time of sore anxiety. He knew
he could call upon the personal hatred of Prussians, who remembered,
themselves or through their people, the French occupation of their
country not many years before. His cheering cry in that heavy march,
of “_Kinder, ihr wollt doch nicht dass ich wortbrüchig werden soll_”
touched the heart of every weary, tired man, and “Englishmen ought
never to forget it,” because it made Waterloo not merely a victory, but
a rout. The hard defensive battle is due to the men, both Germans and
English, Wellington commanded. The utter collapse of the French is due
to Blucher’s steadfastness of purpose, and to Grouchy’s too literal
obedience to Napoleon, and his fear of disobeying his direct command.
None the less Grouchy, useless as a subordinate who had to translate
literal orders into practical action, a good divisional leader when
under distinct orders rather than a semi-independent commander, acting
according to his dim “regulation” lights, saved the remnants of his
force with great skill, and might have done more. To the British army
is due much of that marvellous victory, but not all. Until Colonel
Chesney wrote the Waterloo Lectures, all foreign students of the
campaign looked askance at the claim of the British army to have been,
as for long years it was asserted to be, the only great factor in the
great fight. No proud nation should fear to recognise such external
help, and yet, less than fifty years ago, all British soldiers were led
to believe that they alone had won the hard-fought battle, and that
Prussian help at Waterloo was a mere incident, not a great element in
the victory that is due to both.
[Illustration: _Formation of the Lines of Battle at Waterloo 17^{th}
June 1815._]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account