But the Turk tenaciously held his own in the valley of the Danube,
and England and France declared war. The real defeat of Russia was
not to be on pseudo-Turkish soil. Austria intervened by mobilising
a portion of her army, which therefore threatened the Russian line
of retreat, and in other ways paralysed her freedom of action. This
“benevolent neutrality,” like all such actions which are half-hearted,
made bad blood. No one rejoiced, privately, more than Russia did when
disaster befell Austria in 1866. Said, three weeks after Königgratz,
the governor of East Siberia, who had received the news partly by
telegraph, partly by steamer down the Amoor, when asked why he had
rejoiced that “the Austrians had been gloriously defeated at Sadowa,”
“We have never forgotten or forgiven Austria’s benevolent neutrality of
1854.”
So Russia abandoned her first idea of carrying the war into the enemy’s
country, and had to prepare to defend her own.
The Allied army had been landed, till all danger in that part was over,
at Varna, and had suffered terribly from sickness. Now the seat of war
was transferred to the Crimea, with the object of destroying both the
Russian base of operations in the Black Sea, and her prestige as well,
by the capture of Sebastopol. So the troops embarked; but while both
France and Turkey had to use their ships of war as transports, and
could not therefore convey cavalry, England, with a magnificent fleet
of transports for her troops and a fine squadron of warships to cover
them, was able to embark all three arms for the new seat of war. It was
something even in 1854 to be still a leading naval power. “No power but
England has, indeed, ever successfully despatched a complete army by
sea, at anyrate since the Crusades, save England.”[51]
Thus were landed on the shores of the Crimea, which there run north and
south, on the small, well-protected beach of Balchuk Bay, a few miles
north of the Bulganak River, and about twenty-five miles north of the
principal objective, Sebastopol, a force of 28,000 French--they had
lost 10,000 men by cholera at Varna--and 7000 Turkish infantry, with 68
guns and no cavalry, and the British army of 26,000 infantry, 60 guns,
and a light cavalry brigade of about 1000 sabres. The former forces
were commanded by Marshal St. Arnaud, the latter by Lord Raglan, and
were formed into five divisions, about 5000 men, each of two brigades,
each brigade of two regiments, and with each two field batteries.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account