But, throughout, the evil, from a military standpoint, of the long
peace was apparent. There was want of method in the attack and want
of supreme direction. The artillery was badly handled, and was used
without combined effort. It would have been wiser if the whole force
had made a flank attack on the Russian right, and both threatened
directly his line of retreat and penned him in against the coast.[54]
And, finally, the cavalry were not used at all. “I will keep my
cavalry in a bandbox,” said Raglan, which, however cautious, was not
“_l’audace_”; and so, partly due to French advice no doubt, there
was no pursuit and no rout. Once again, as often in the Peninsula,
the battle was won by the fighting power of the men rather than the
genius of the commander. Throughout, the cavalry, instead of spreading
widely for information, were kept close to the columns they should
have covered. Finally, while the Russians admit a loss of 6000 men,
the British suffered one of 2000, and that of the French was estimated
by Raglan at the most as three officers and 560 men. Two days were
then wasted, and on the 23rd the army made the magnificent march of
seven miles, and on the next day six more! With greater celerity
Sebastopol might, in all human probability, have been carried by
assault. So thought Todleben himself, the commanding engineer in the
Russian fortress, and he was no mean judge. The defeated army had
only garrisoned the fortress, and then proposed falling back into the
interior. There was, too, a dread of the fortifications themselves
on the part of the leaders of the British army, which is somewhat to
be wondered at, with the traditions of Badajoz and Ciudad Rodrigo
still not forgotten, by some at least. The works on the north side
of the harbour were deemed too formidable to attack; it was decided,
therefore, to make a flank march round the place and try the southern
side. It must be remembered that the general line of march was north to
south, that of the harbour east and west; and that beyond the upland
which lay behind the town, and which was to be the site of the coming
siege, were two harbours, Balaklava and Kamiesch, which might be used
as new bases of operation against the great fortress of the Crimea.
So the most remarkable flank march in military history was begun.
Owing to the confusion that characterised much of the staff work of
the campaign, the general-in-chief found himself leading the entire
column, the advanced guard having lost its way (!), with behind him
thirty guns; and this through a thick wood. The British general was in
as complete ignorance that the Russian army was moving across his front
five miles away, as was Mentschikoff in equally blissful ignorance that
his enemy was crossing the rear of his column of march. Thus, not even
the true advanced guard, but some of the main column, cut off some of
the Russian baggage train.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account