Such was the military domestic life of these years before the Mutiny;
and in such a question the change was so gradual that it is hard to
say when it really came. After 1858 there were many alterations in the
inner life of the army, doubtless; but before then, notwithstanding
the much-abused system of purchase, officers lived apparently less
extravagantly than they do now. Modern extravagance is due, no
doubt, to the general increase of luxury among all classes; but it
is curious to read, in an official blue-book of the early fifties,
Lieutenant-Colonel Adams’ evidence, in which he states: “Very many men
never had a farthing in the regiment which I first joined, when we
were quartered at Plymouth with a regiment of the Guards. There were
people of all ranks there; there were guardsmen and cavalrymen. Colonel
Stewart, the son of the famous philosopher Dugald Stewart, was a man
of property. And people not only lived there without a farthing beside
their pay, but our establishment was so good that frequently it has
been remarked to me by officers of the Guards, ‘All your people are
men of property.’ ‘Oh,’ I said, ‘I wish they were, but most of them
get nothing beside their pay.’” It is strange to read opinions so much
at variance with those of the bulk of the officers to-day. He did not
think that the poorer men got into debt more readily than those with
good allowances, which “stimulated them to keep horses and get into
racing.” The whole style of living in the army must have been widely
different from what it is now. Sir Howard Douglas’s evidence was: “When
I first entered the service, the officers’ mess was very much what the
sergeants’ mess is now. Subalterns could live on their pay, and did
in every regiment live on their pay.” This statement, however, seems
to refer to the days of the Peninsular War, and not to the long peace
that followed it. With greater wealth in the country came also among
all classes greater luxury, though possibly by slow degrees. General
Wetherall, however, though he “knew a great many examples of men who
had passed, and had been many years in the army without a shilling
besides their pay, and who had saved money upon it,” considered a young
officer should have “a minimum of £60 and a maximum of £100 per annum
in addition to his pay.” Colonel Adams gave as his opinion: “You can
never get one person out of fifty to enter into any studies whatever
when once they have got their commission.” This was the general feeling
during the period from 1825 to 1858. There is no doubt that the Crimean
War first, and the Mutiny finally, altered much of this; but the change
was very gradual none the less.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account