There were, besides the Life and Horse Guards, the seven Dragoon
Guards Regiments, the light regiments up to the 8th Light Dragoons (of
which the 7th, formed from troops of the “Greys” and Royal Dragoons,
was disbanded in 1713, but restored in 1715), and up to the 39th Foot
inclusive; and of these the 30th, 31st and 32nd, as Sanderson’s,
Villiers’ and Fox’s Marines, had been raised for sea service before
coming on the army’s strength. It cannot be too often pointed out
that the regiments were formed and disbanded more or less after every
war, and that consequently many rank their seniority from their first
creation.
The arms had little changed. The cuirass for cavalry was abandoned in
1702 and restored temporarily in 1707. The socketed bayonet had been
introduced, and Blenheim was the first _great_ battle in which the
pike had been replaced by the new weapon. Sergeants still carried the
halberd, which was succeeded as time went on by the lighter pike or
“spontoon,” which remained in the service until after the Peninsular
war, and which was carried by the “covering sergeant,” who protected or
“covered” his captain with the weapon while his superior directed the
work of the company.
The colours, formerly three in number, had by this time been reduced
to two, the one the Union “Jack,” the other the Regimental Colour, the
ground of which was that of the regimental facings.
Doubtless the political feeling of expediency and the want of a larger
revenue had still much to do with these continuous and expensive
reductions, even more than the decaying dread of standing armies. They
were expensive as involving greater expenditure when war broke out
afresh, as it was likely to do. They cost the internal economy of the
State much, from the difficulty of finding employment for the vast
numbers of disbanded soldiery after a campaign. Politicians of the time
were too narrow-minded to see that it costs less to be always prepared
for war in peace rather than wait for the warlike necessity to arise.
They were “penny wise and pound foolish” then, much as we are to-day.
Taxpayers and Governments are proverbially slow to recognise this. The
greater the national wealth, the more need for the national insurance.
That means an army and a navy sufficient for that insurance.
CHAPTER VI
THE EMBERS OF THE CIVIL WAR--TO 1755
The method of raising the army from the early part of the eighteenth
century until nearly its end had been by a curious system of contract.
Recruiting at first was mainly voluntary; but paupers or prisoners for
civil offences were given the option of serving in the ranks. Hence was
it that the armies that “swore so horribly in Flanders” got the bad
name that clung to the profession of arms in Great Britain until recent
years. The class of recruits, the severity of punishment, and the
degradation of the lash were the three main reasons why, in the opinion
of many worthy country people, to become a soldier was to be lost!
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account