The story of the Congo Free State : $b Social, political, and economic aspects of the Belgian system of government in Central AfricaWack, Henry Wellington
History
The story of the Congo Free State : $b Social, political, and economic aspects of the Belgian system of government in Central Africa
Wack, Henry Wellington
Belgium -- Colonies -- Africa -- Administration; Congo (Democratic Republic) -- History -- To 1908
thought would frighten the Belgian Government from permitting it
to be dealt with. I do not know what the price might have been
which they would have asked for, but that there was a price they
were thinking of you will see in a minute or two. What did they
expect to get for it? We do not know. But we do know this, that
there were two principals in the matter, and there was by way of
being a subordinate. I speak of Mr. Leigh as a subordinate. I do
not suggest in the least that he was associated with the attempt
that was being made in Belgium, but what we know is, that he was
doing a minor part of the work, that the manuscript was said to
have been Captain Burrows’ manuscript, that the materials for this
book were supposed to be Captain Burrows’ materials, and Captain
Burrows therefore was the principal person, and Messrs. Everett
had lent their name and their work, and were acting with Captain
Burrows, and no doubt expected a very large share of the money that
would be got from the Belgian Government. If Mr. Leigh, in his
modest inconspicuous, and irresponsible position, was to get £500
for helping in putting together the materials for this book, what
do you think that Captain Burrows and Mr. Everett thought that they
might be able to extort from the fear of the Belgian Government
that this thing would go all over the world?
The address to the jury of Mr. Crispe, counsel for the Defendant
Burrows, was often eloquent, always adroit, and showed great skill in
defending a cause to which the main defence had been abandoned when
the pleas of justification were withdrawn.
Gentlemen [said Counsel for Everett & Co., one of the defendants],
apart from what Commandant Liebrechts termed “moral damage,” there
is no evidence of actual damage suffered by Captain De Keyser
in this having come to the knowledge of Commandant Liebrechts.
Commandant Liebrechts says that he had investigated these charges
and found out that they were false. If so, the repetition of them
could have no effect upon his mind as regards the complicity
of Captain De Keyser in them, and therefore, so far as that is
concerned, no damage could have been suffered with reference to
Commandant Liebrechts.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account