As the spindle and bobbin revolve, they pull the traveller round by the
yarn which passes through it, being connected at one end to the bobbin
and the rollers above forming another point of attachment. If the reader
will look carefully at the illustration he will see how twist is put in
the yarn. The joint action, then, of bobbin, traveller and fixed ring,
is to put the necessary twist in the yarn which gives it its proper
degree of strength. If no fresh roving from the rollers were issuing for
the moment, the small portion of thread reaching from the rollers to
the bobbins would simply be twisted without any "winding-on" taking
place. As a matter of fact, the roving always is issuing from the
rollers, and "winding-on" of the twisted roving is performed by the
traveller lagging behind the bobbin in speed, to a degree equal to the
delivery of roving by the rollers. It will be remembered that in the old
flyer-throstle "winding-on" was performed by the bobbin lagging behind
the spindle, a procedure which is impossible on the ring frame.
There is also an arrangement of the mechanism for guiding and shaping
the yarn upon the bobbins in suitable form, the action being as nearly
as possible an imitation of the mule.
For a number of years after the introduction of these frames, it was
found that the threads often broke down owing to the twist not extending
through the roving to the point where it issued from the rollers. This
was eventually remedied by placing the drawing rollers in a different
position, thus causing the thread running from the rollers to the
traveller to approach more to the vertical; this constituting the
modification which has just been referred to previously.
Another difficulty was experienced in the fact that during spinning the
threads would sometimes fly outwards to such an extent that adjacent
threads came in contact with each other, causing excessive breakage.
This was technically termed "ballooning," and has been very
satisfactorily restricted by the invention of special apparatus.
At the present time, therefore, a contest between the two rival systems
of continuous spinning which were in bitter antagonism over a century
ago, is waging a more fiercely contested fight than at any previous
time.
As the case stands to-day, the mule is retained for nearly all the best
and finest yarns as yet found; the most suitable for them, just as it
was when Crompton got 25s. per pound for spinning fine muslin yarns on
his first mule.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account