The Story of the CrusadesWilmot-Buxton, E. M. (Ethel Mary)
History
The Story of the Crusades
Wilmot-Buxton, E. M. (Ethel Mary)
Crusades
The sacred fire of enthusiasm for the "Cause of God" still flickered
faintly in Europe during the years that immediately preceded the fall
of Constantinople. Our own Henry V., during his lifetime, sent out a
knight of Burgundy, Gilbert de Lannoy, to see what chances there were
of the success of a new Crusade; and Henry's dying words showed that he
had not forgotten his design. "Good Lord, Thou knowest that mine
intent had been, and yet is, if I may live, to rebuild the walls of
Jerusalem."
But with the fall of Constantinople, all further hope of wresting the
Holy Land from the infidel came to an end. Never again did a prince of
the West set out to recover those "holy fields," and to this day they
are ruled by the Sultan of Turkey.
It is said of Columbus that he had in mind the idea of stirring up an
Eastern War in the "Cause of God" before there had dawned upon him the
vision of that Western {277} enterprise which was to open the gate to a
new world. And that religious zeal did not die with the Crusades is to
be seen in the constant stream of pilgrims to the Holy Land which, for
a hundred years, followed the final defeat of Christendom, and which,
suspended though it was during the spiritual apathy of the eighteenth
century, has continued down to the present day.
But the Age of Warfare was over when Constantinople fell, and with the
dawn of that great awakening of thought and literature which we call
the Renaissance, men turned away from bloodshed to the joys of
discovery and enterprise in a new world.
A little later, when the Wars of the Reformation broke out, and Europe
took up the sword anew, the whole spirit of the Western world had
changed. The East had lost its glamour, and the antagonism between
religious and political parties had waxed so hot in Christendom that
the old feud between Christian and pagan was entirely laid aside.
Yet the Crusades, in spite of their apparent failure, had done a great
work. First and foremost they had succeeded in deferring the rule of
the Turk in Europe, and by the constant checks they offered to his
progress, had prevented him from conquering anything but the merest
fringe of the West. The advantage of this, apart from considerations
of religion, will be seen at once if we compare the condition of the
subjects of the Sultan with that of the more progressive of the
Christian races of Europe.
But the benefits conferred upon Europe by the Crusades are by no means
only of this negative character. The Saracen of the Middle Ages was a
learned and cultured gentleman, skilled in medicine, in music, and in
various {278} other sciences, and, generally speaking, as much superior
to the rough uneducated Crusader of the Western World as he was to the
savage Ottoman Turk.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account