The Story of the Rome, Watertown, and Ogdensburg RailroadHungerford, Edward
History
The Story of the Rome, Watertown, and Ogdensburg Railroad
Hungerford, Edward
Railroads -- New York (State) -- History; Rome, Watertown & Ogdensburg Railroad Company
In 1871 the passenger service of the R. W. & O. consisted of two trains
through from Rome to Ogdensburgh without change. The first left Rome at
4:30 a. m., passed through Watertown at 7:38 a. m., and arrived at
Ogdensburgh at 11:15 a. m. The second left Rome at 1:00 p. m., passed
through Watertown at 4:17 p. m., and arrived at Ogdensburgh at 7:10 p. m.
Returning the first of these trains left Ogdensburgh at 6:08 a. m., passed
through Watertown at 9:20 a. m., and arrived at Rome at 12:10 p. m.: the
second left Ogdensburgh at 3:00 p. m., passed through Watertown at 6:35
p. m., and reached Rome and the New York Central at 9:05 p. m. The
similarity between these trains and those upon the present time-card, the
long established Seven and One and Four and Eight, is astonishing. Put an
important train but once upon a time card, and seemingly it is hard to get
it off again.
In addition to these four important through trains there were others: The
Watertown Express, leaving Rome at 5:30 p. m. and "dying" at Watertown at
9:05 p. m., was the precursor of the present Number Three. The return
movement of this train was as the New York Express, leaving Watertown at
8:10 a. m. and reaching Rome at 11:35 a. m. There were also three trains a
day in each direction on the Cape Vincent, and Oswego branches and two on
the one between DeKalb and Potsdam Junctions.
* * * * *
For a railroad to render real service it must have, not alone good
track--in those early days the Rome road, as it was known colloquially,
gave great and constant attention to its right of way--but good engines.
Up to about 1870 these were exclusively wood-burners, many of them
weighing not more than from twenty to twenty-five tons each. They were of
a fairly wide variety of type. While the output of the Rome Locomotive
Works was always favored, there were numbers of engines from the Rhode
Island, the Taunton and the Schenectady Works.
Thirty-eight of these wood-burning engines formed the motive-power
equipment of the Rome road in the spring of 1869. Their names--locomotives
in those days invariably were named--were as follows:
1. _Watertown_
2. _Rome_
3. _Adams_
4. _Kingston_
5. _O. Hungerford_
6. _Col. Edwin Kirby_
7. _Norris Woodruff_
8. _Camden_
9. _J. L. Grant_
10. _Job Collamer_
11. _Jefferson_
12. _R. B. Doxtater_
13. _O. V. Brainard_
14. _North Star_
15. _T. H. Camp_
16. _Silas Wright_
17. _Antwerp_
18. _Wm. C. Pierrepont_
19. _St. Lawrence_
20. _Potsdam_
21. _Ontario_
22. _Montreal_
23. _New York_
24. _Ogdensburgh_
25. _Oswego_
26. _D. DeWitt_
27. _D. Utley_
28. _M. Massey_
29. _H. Moore_
30. _C. Comstock_
31. _S. F. Phelps_
32. _Col. Wm. Lord_
33. _H. Alexander, Jr._
34. _Roxbury_
35. _Com. Perry_
36. _C. E. Bill_
37. _Gen. S. D. Hungerford_
38. _Gardner Colby_
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account