The Story of the Solar SystemChambers, George F. (George Frederick)
Science
The Story of the Solar System
Chambers, George F. (George Frederick)
Solar system
concentric with the planet’s axis whilst the southern polar patch is
eccentric to the extent of about 180 miles from the southern pole is one
which has not yet received a satisfactory explanation. If both patches
were eccentric so as to be exactly opposite to one another an
explanation would be much more easy for we might say that the poles of
rotation lay in one direction and the poles of cold in another.
I have spoken on a previous page of three specially conspicuous shadings
of Mars, and other similar shadings to the number perhaps of a couple of
dozen were generally recognised by astronomers (having been mapped and
named) down to about the year 1877. In that year the astronomical world
was startled by the announcement that Schiaparelli of Milan, an able and
competent observer, had discovered that those shaded areas which all
previous astronomers had regarded as continents or vast tracts of land,
were in reality islands, that is to say, so far, that the continents in
question were cut up by innumerable channels intersecting one another at
various angles. When this discovery was announced, and older
observations and drawings came to be examined, it was found, or at
any-rate thought, that these so-called canals might be traced in
drawings of earlier dates by Dawes, Secchi, and Holden. So much for
1877. In December, 1881, the planet was again in opposition, but farther
off in distance, and therefore smaller in size than in 1877. It was,
however, higher up in the Heavens as seen at Milan and the weather
appears to have been more favourable. In these altered circumstances
Schiaparelli again saw his canals, but this time they were in at least
as many as twenty instances seen in duplicate; that is to say, a twin
canal was seen to run parallel to the original one at a distance of from
200 to 400 miles, as the case might be. The existence of not only single
canals but of twin canals seems an established fact, for Schiaparelli’s
drawings and descriptions have been confirmed by competent testimony;
but explanation is nowhere; especially in view of Schiaparelli’s own
idea that the duplication of his canals is perhaps not a permanent
feature but a periodical phenomenon depending on, or connected in some
way with, Mars’s seasons.
[Illustration: Fig. 13.—Mars, August 27, 1892 (Guiot).]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account