The story of the sun, moon, and starsGiberne, Agnes
Science
The story of the sun, moon, and stars
Giberne, Agnes
Astronomy -- Juvenile literature
By carefully considering this double movement, you will see that the
real motion of the earth--as also of each of the planets--is not a
going round on a flat surface to the same point from which she started,
but is a corkscrew-like winding round and round upwards through space.
Yet as regards the central sun, the shape of the orbit comes very near
being an ellipse, if calculated simply by the earth’s distance from him
at each point in turn of her pathway through the year.
An illustration may help to explain this. On the deck of a moving
vessel, you see a little boy walking steadily round and round the mast.
Now is that child moving in a circle, or is he not? Yes, he is. No, he
is not. He walks in a circle as regards the position of the mast, which
remains always the center of his pathway. But his movement _in space_
is never a circle, since he constantly advances, and does not once
return to his starting-point. You see how the two facts are possible
side by side. Being carried forward by the ship, with no effort of his
own, the forward motion does not interfere with the circling motion.
Each is performed independently of the other.
It is the same with the earth and the planets. The sun, by force of
his mighty attraction, bears them along wherever he goes--no exertion
on their part, so to speak, being needed. That motion does not in the
least interfere with their steady circling round the sun.
Just as--to use another illustration--the earth, turning on her axis,
bears through space a man standing on the Equator at the rate of one
thousand miles an hour. But this uniform movement, unfelt by himself,
does not prevent his walking backwards, or forwards, or in circles, as
much as he will.
So, also, a bird in the air is unconsciously borne along with the
atmosphere, yet his freedom to wheel in circles for any length of time
is untouched.
A few words about the orbits of the planets. I have more than once
remarked that these pathways are, in shape, not circles, but ellipses.
A circle is a line drawn in the shape of a ring, every part of which
is at exactly the same distance from the center-point or focus. But an
ellipse, instead of being, like a circle, perfectly round, is oval in
shape; and instead of having only one focus, it has two foci, neither
being exactly in the center. Foci is the plural word for focus. If
an ellipse is only slightly oval--or slightly _elliptical_--the two
foci are near together. The more oval or _eccentric_ the ellipse, the
farther apart are the two foci.
You may draw a circle in this manner. Lay a sheet of white paper on a
board, and fix a nail through the paper into the board. Then pass a
loop of thread--say an inch or an inch and a half in length--round the
nail, and also round a pencil, which you hold. Trace a line with the
pencil, keeping the loop tight, so that the distance of your line from
the nail will be always equal, and when it joins you have a circle. The
nail in the center is the focus of the circle.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account