The Story of the Sun: New York, 1833-1918O'Brien, Frank Michael
History
The Story of the Sun: New York, 1833-1918
O'Brien, Frank Michael
Sun (New York, N.Y. : 1833)
For the postmastership Charles A. Dana of the _Tribune_,
Daniel Ullman, Thomas B. Stillman, and Armor J. Williamson are
named. Either Mr. Dana or Mr. Williamson would fill the office
creditably.
That was probably the first time that Charles A. Dana got his name into
the _Sun_.
Although unqualifiedly opposed to Secession, the _Sun_ did not believe
that military coercion was the best way to prevent it. It saw the
temper of South Carolina and other Southern States, but thought that it
saw, too, a diplomatic way of curing the disorder. South Carolina, it
said, had a greater capacity for indignation than any other political
body in the world. Here was the way to stop its wrath:
Open the door of the Union for a free and inglorious egress,
and you dry up the machine in an instant.
This was somewhat on a plane with Horace Greeley’s advice in the
_Tribune_--“Let the erring sisters go in peace.” The _Sun_, however,
was more Machiavellian:
Our proposition is that the Constitution be so amended as
to permit any State, within a limited period, and upon her
surrender of her share in the Federal property, to retire
from the confederacy [the Union] in peace. It is a plan to
emasculate Secession by depriving it of its present stimulating
illegality. Does any one suppose that even South Carolina would
withdraw from the Union if her withdrawal were normal?
This was printed on December 8, 1860, some weeks before the fate of the
Crittenden Compromise, beaten by Southern votes, showed beyond doubt
that the South actually preferred disunion.
With mingled grief and indignation the _Sun_ watched the Southern
States march out of the Union. It poured its wrath on the head of
the mayor of New York, Fernando Wood, when that peculiar statesman
suggested, on January 7, 1861, that New York City should also secede.
“Why may not New York disrupt the bonds which bind her to a venal and
corrupt master?” Wood had inquired.
The _Sun_ had more faith in Lincoln than most of its Democratic
contemporaries exhibited. Of his inaugural speech it said:
There is a manly sincerity, geniality, and strength to be felt
in the whole address.
The day after the fall of Fort Sumter the _Sun_ found a moment to turn
on the South-loving _Herald_:
We state only what the proprietor of the _Herald_ undoubtedly
believes when we say that if the national ensign had not been
hung out yesterday from its windows, as a concession to the
gathering crowd, the issue of that paper for another day would
have been more than doubtful.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account