The story of the UkraineManning, Clarence Augustus
History
The story of the Ukraine
Manning, Clarence Augustus
Kievan Rus -- History; Ukraine -- History
It stands to reason that the Bolsheviks had no intention of allowing
such an Assembly to meet, for they well knew that the Council and the
Ukrainian people were opposed to the excesses of the Bolsheviks and
their system of massacring their opponents, and that any expression of
the wishes of the people would establish some other form of government.
As a result they continued their policy of trying to disintegrate the
Council and of arousing discontent in all possible quarters. By sending
Bolshevik bands, composed largely of non-Ukrainians, into the country,
by spreading incendiary appeals to the people, by fomenting class
hatred in every way, they succeeded in keeping the country stirred up
and in preventing the stabilization of conditions.
Then they induced the Kiev Soviet, composed chiefly of non-Ukrainian
workers in some of the factories, to demand the calling of an
All-Ukrainian Council of Soviets on December 5/17. The Council saw
to it that this was not a mere rump convention of the Bolsheviks, as
Stalin had planned, but was widely representative of all the leftist
elements of Ukraine which were grouped in Soviets or Councils. As a
result, the Bolshevik resolutions were voted down and the following
was adopted: “The meeting of the Ukrainian Councils emphasizes its
definite decision that the Central Council in its further work stand
solidly on guard over the achievement of the revolution, spreading
and deepening without halt the revolutionary activity to safeguard
the class interests of a laboring democracy and call together without
delay the Ukrainian Constituent Assembly, which alone can reveal the
true will of all democratic Ukraine. The meeting of the Councils of
Peasants’, Workmen’s and Soldiers’ Delegates of Ukraine in this manner
expresses to the Ukrainian Central Council its full confidence and
promises it its absolute support.” The resolution went on to say, “On
paper the Soviet of People’s Commissars seemingly recognizes the right
of a nation to self-determination and even to separation, but only
in words. In fact, the government of Commissars brutally attempts to
interfere in the activities of the Ukrainian government which executes
the will of the legislative organ of the Central Council. What sort
of self-determination is this? It is certain the Commissars will
permit self-determination only to their own party; all other groups
and peoples they, like the Tsarist regime, desire to keep under their
domination by force of arms. But the Ukrainian people did not cast
off the Tsarist yoke only to take upon themselves the yoke of the
Commissars.”
This resolution, adopted in December, 1917, expresses with rare nicety
the entire policy of Soviet thought on its relations with other peoples
and groups and it would have been well for Ukraine, had the sober
judgment of these Councils prevailed. It would have saved a great deal
of anguish and bloodshed in the coming years.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account