The story of the UkraineManning, Clarence Augustus
History
The story of the Ukraine
Manning, Clarence Augustus
Kievan Rus -- History; Ukraine -- History
On the other hand, the victorious Allies could not forget the
sacrifices that had been made by the Russian Empire during the early
years of the War and they persisted in believing that once Bolshevism
was overthrown, all of these new nations would be only too willing to
join in a new, free, and democratic Russia. They hated to do anything
that would create a permanent situation. They were equally opposed to
the efforts of the White Russian armies to form a definite conservative
government which might be denounced as reactionary and aiming to
restore the old Russian monarchy. Thus the policy of the Allies toward
Russia remained in a dangerous position which could only in the long
run strengthen the power of the Bolsheviks, the only group which was
not affected by the desires of the Allies and which understood the
general weakness of the entire Allied policy.
As a result there was made almost no mention of Russia in any of the
treaties that came out of the Paris Peace Conference, for it was
intended that the matter should be reconsidered, when, as, and if
Russia expelled the Bolsheviks and proceeded to hold democratic and
free elections. This brought about the impossible situation that the
Congress could seriously consider regulations as to the position of
Eastern Galicia (Western Ukraine) toward Poland, since the area had
been under Austria-Hungary, but could not and would not take action in
regard to that part of Ukraine which had been under Russian rule prior
to 1914.
The Poles utilized the situation to extend their claims over Western
Ukraine and they obstinately refused to consider any settlement which
would establish a political boundary between Poland and Western
Ukraine, no matter how the case was put forward. Step by step the
Allies moderated their demands, especially since France insisted
stubbornly on backing almost all of the Polish claims. Thus on June
25, the Allied Supreme Council allowed Poland to occupy the territory
up to the Zbruch River with a proviso that the Poles should guarantee
local autonomy and freedom of religion to the non-Polish population.
A little later they again offered to give Poland a twenty-five-year
mandate over Eastern Galicia and to grant a plebiscite at the end of
that time. Then, later in the year, they developed the idea of the
Curzon line to mark the eastern boundary of the country, but there
was also the supplementary idea that if Poland occupied land beyond
this, she might receive it when the future of Russia was settled. In
view of the weak Polish organization, which was only struggling to its
feet and was short of all supplies, this idea that the Poles should
organize a section of Russia by their own efforts could only increase
the Polish claims. It is therefore not surprising in view of the entire
tangle that the Peace Treaties provided no definite eastern boundary
for Poland and in fact do not mention one in the official texts of the
documents.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account