The story of the UkraineManning, Clarence Augustus
History
The story of the Ukraine
Manning, Clarence Augustus
Kievan Rus -- History; Ukraine -- History
It is not at all impossible that the history of Europe would have been
very different, if in 1919 there had been on the scene and in control
men of the breath of vision of Hadiach, whereby Rus’ was recognized
as a third component part of a Great Poland, on a par with Poland and
Lithuania. The Soviet occupation of Eastern Ukraine was really leaving
Western Ukraine to itself; with its bitter opposition to Communism and
proper diplomacy it might have joined a great federation which would
have solved the problem of eastern Europe. No one of any prominence
put forward or even tried to secure a hearing for any such plan,
and it is hard to see what would have been the position of Western
Ukraine, had the proposal to grant it a plebiscite twenty-five years
in the future been carried out. It could only have meant a continued
unsettlement in policy and can become intelligible only if it is
assumed that the Conference at Paris believed that within that time
the entire Ukrainian problem would have been settled and that Eastern
Galicia or Western Ukraine would then vote itself into union with
the rest of the country. If that is true, then there is the further
question as to why the Conference bound itself so strictly to its
furtherance of the White Russian armies and the unity of Russia that
it refused to send supplies to the Ukrainian forces who were still
struggling against the overwhelming power of the Reds.
Whatever may have been the motives back of the actions at Paris,
the Poles determined to produce a unified state in which the power
would be entirely in Polish hands. They realized that a considerable
portion of the Ukrainians living in Eastern Galicia had already been
Polonized, that, for example, the brother of Archbishop Sheptitsky was
the Chief of Staff in the Polish army, and they still believed that
in a relatively few years the restored Poland could so accelerate the
process that the province would be thoroughly absorbed into a unified
state.
As a result, during the formative years, the Constituent Diet of Poland
was elected at a time when Western Ukraine was still in arms in support
of its own government and hence there was no reason why the Ukrainians
should vote in the Polish elections. Thus in the formation of the
Polish Constitution they had no vote and the power rested entirely in
the hands of the Polish nationalists who were the strong supporters
of a centralized state. Even later, in 1922 since under the decree of
the Peace Conference, Eastern Galicia was supposed to have its own
independent Diet, the Ukrainians again declined to vote for delegates
to the Polish Diet, contrary to the decrees of the Peace Conference
and the Council of Ambassadors that continued its work. There was thus
produced an impasse between the Polish and Ukrainian points of view
which could only add to the general bitterness and this required the
most careful handling on the Polish part.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account