The story of the universe. Volume 3 (of 4) : $b The earth's garment : flora
History
The story of the universe. Volume 3 (of 4) : $b The earth's garment : flora
Astronomy; Earth (Planet); Natural history
Between the form of a twig and that of the leaves which it bears we
can generally at once perceive a relation. The little leaves of the
birch are borne on twigs slender as a piece of twine. The oak and
elm, with larger leaves, require a stouter twig for their support.
The sycamore and ash have twigs which are stouter still. The large
leaves of the horse chestnut are borne on very thick twigs, in which
the principle of the hollow column is introduced.
The arrangement of the leaves on the stem, or _phyllotaxis_, is a
question of the first importance. The leaves must be so grouped that
all may receive as much light as possible. So far as can be arranged,
there should be no overlapping, nor should any of the available space
be wasted. On the stem of the ash, or sycamore, or teazel, the large
leaves are arranged in alternate pairs, the direction of the axis
of each pair being at right angles to that of the next. Thus two
spaces or _internodes_ separate any pair of leaves from the nearest
pair which, being placed in the same position, might overshadow it.
This is a very simple case, which we shall find to be the rule when
we examine plants in which the leaves are borne in opposite pairs.
When leaves are borne in whorls of three a similar rule will be found
to hold good. The position of the leaves of any whorl is such that
they are vertically below or above the _spaces_ between the leaves
of the next whorl. It will be seen at once that the amount of light
received by each leaf is materially increased by this arrangement.
If in a theatre we can look between the heads of two people in the
row immediately in front of us, the head of a person in the next row
beyond, even though directly before us, does not much interfere with
our view of the stage. In most cases, however, the arrangement of the
leaves on the stem is much more complicated than this. The leaves
usually emerge singly. If we join by a line the point of emergence
of a leaf with that of the next leaf above it on a stem, and that
again with the next, a spiral will be the result, along which at
equal intervals we reach the _nodes_, or points where leaves are
borne. And the distance between these nodes will be always found to
bear some definite relation to the total length of the spiral line
in making one complete revolution round the stem. If the distance
from node to node is one-half of this whole distance, it signifies
that the leaves are borne alternately on opposite sides of the
stem, each leaf being vertically below the second one higher up the
stem--a very common arrangement. Or the leaves may be borne three
to each spiral revolution, so that the position of each leaf shifts
one-third way round the stem as compared with the preceding leaf.
If we look along such a stem, the leaves will appear to be borne in
three vertical rows, with an equal angle between each. Examining some
other plant, we may find that we have to go as far as the fifth leaf
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account