The story of the universe. Volume 3 (of 4) : $b The earth's garment : flora
History
The story of the universe. Volume 3 (of 4) : $b The earth's garment : flora
Astronomy; Earth (Planet); Natural history
The system of Linnæus rests upon the consideration of the organs
of fecundation--organs almost overlooked until then, but whose
physiological functions have since been ably demonstrated. He
introduced in 1736 a salutary and much-wanted reform into botanical
language and nomenclature, defining most rigorously the terms used to
express the various modifications and characters of the organs, and
reducing the name of each plant to two words, the first designating
the genus, the second designating a species of the genus. Before
his time, in fact, it was necessary to follow the name of the genus
through a whole sentence in order to characterize the species, and
in proportion as the number of species increased, the sentences
were lengthened until it seemed as if they would never come to an
end. It was like the confusion which would arise in society if, in
place of using the baptismal name and surname, we were to suppress
the baptismal name, and substitute for it an enumeration of many
qualities distinctive of the individual; as if, for example, in place
of saying Pierre Durand or Louis Durand, we said Durand the great
sportsman, or any other phraseology applicable to the qualities of
the individual. Nevertheless the Linnæan or binary nomenclature is
one of the great titles to that glory which has been awarded to
its immortal author. In the scheme of the Linnæan system it has
been found possible to describe all plants discovered since his
time--an irrefragable proof of the great merits of this artificial
classification of species.
This classification of plants has received the name of the artificial
system, because it groups the species according to a small number
and not from the whole of their characteristics; in short, it rather
permits one class to be distinguished from another than makes each
known in an intimate manner. It insists much upon their differences,
little upon their resemblances. Between species thus compared, only
one essential analogy may exist. The rush takes place beside the
barberry, because each of these plants has six stamens and only
one style. The vine is ranged beside the periwinkle, because they
each have five stamens and one style. The carrot is allied to the
gooseberry, etc. There may not be between the plants thus compared
any natural bond, but only some trace of resemblance in a particular
part of the organization, which may be found also in a number of very
different plants.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account