The story of the universe. Volume 4 (of 4) : $b The earth's creatures : fauna
History
The story of the universe. Volume 4 (of 4) : $b The earth's creatures : fauna
Astronomy; Earth (Planet); Natural history
I must here introduce a short digression. In the case of animals
and plants with separated sexes, it is of course obvious that
two individuals must always (with the exception of the curious
and not well understood cases of parthenogenesis) unite for
each birth; but in the case of hermaphrodites this is far from
obvious. Nevertheless there is reason to believe that with all
hermaphrodites two individuals, either occasionally or habitually,
concur for the reproduction of their kind. This view was long ago
doubtfully suggested by Sprengel, Knight, and Kölreuter. We shall
presently see its importance; but I must here treat the subject
with extreme brevity, though I have the materials prepared for an
ample discussion. All vertebrate animals, all insects, and some
other large groups of animals, pair for each birth. Modern research
has much diminished the number of supposed hermaphrodites; and of
real hermaphrodites a large number pair; that is, two individuals
regularly unite for reproduction, which is all that concerns us. But
still there are many hermaphrodite animals which certainly do not
habitually pair, and a vast majority of plants are hermaphrodites.
What reason, it may be asked, is there for supposing in these cases
that two individuals ever concur in reproduction? As it is impossible
here to enter on details, I must trust to some general considerations
alone.
In the first place, I have collected so large a body of facts, and
made so many experiments, showing, in accordance with the almost
universal belief of breeders, that with animals and plants a cross
between different varieties, or between individuals of the same
variety but of another strain, gives vigor and fertility to the
offspring; and, on the other hand, that _close_ interbreeding
diminishes vigor and fertility; that these facts alone incline me
to believe that it is a general law of nature that no organic being
fertilizes itself for a perpetuity of generations; but that a cross
with another individual is occasionally--perhaps at long intervals of
time--indispensable.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account