The Story of the Woman's PartyGillmore, Inez Haynes
History
The Story of the Woman's Party
Gillmore, Inez Haynes
National Woman's Party; Paul, Alice, 1885-1977; Women -- Suffrage -- United States
Tribute to the strength of the Woman’s Party campaign is contained in
the remark of a woman who had in charge the campaign of the Democratic
women voters. Out of six leaflets which her organization got out, five
were on the subject of Suffrage. A reporter remonstrated with her in
regard to Suffrage not being an issue in the West. She agreed with him,
but, she added, “We have to combat the Woman’s Party.”
The whole Western campaign of the Republicans was conducted as if they
were assured of victory. In many cases the organizers of the Woman’s
Party told the Republicans in the East that they were going to lose in
certain districts. “Nonsense,” laughed the Republicans, “we are sure to
win there, absolutely sure.” Alice Paul in Chicago received reports from
campaigners through the West and all predicted Democratic victory. She
went to Republican Headquarters with these reports, but she could not
convince the Republicans of the truth of them.
Senator Curtis, Secretary of the Republican Senatorial Committee, said
he got more information as to the situation in the West from the Woman’s
Party than he got from any other source.
It became apparent soon that Wilson was going to win. It was then that
advisors came to Alice Paul and said, “Withdraw your speakers from the
campaign, so that you will not have the humiliation of defeat before the
country.”
And it was then that Alice Paul answered, “_No. If we withdraw our
speakers from the campaign, we withdraw the issue from the campaign. We
must make this such an important thing in national elections that the
Democrats will not want to meet it again._”
Commenting on this campaign, Alice Paul said the Democrats made a strong
appeal to the women voters but for the Republicans the women did not
exist, and in fact the chief recognition that the Republicans made of
the women in the West was to send there the Hughes so-called “Golden
Special,” which, on leaving Chicago, announced that it was _not_ a
“Suffrage Special.”
After the campaign was over, Vance McCormick, Chairman of the Democratic
Party, was talking with a member of his committee. He said, in effect:
“Before the election of 1918, we must patch up our weak places. Our
weakest spot is the Suffrage situation. We must get rid of the Suffrage
Amendment before 1918 if we want to control the next Congress.”
* * * * *
The Sixty-fourth Congress met for its second and last session on
December 4, 1916. President Wilson delivered a message which made no
reference to the subject of Woman Suffrage. The Congressional Union,
always having advance information, knew this beforehand. And so on that
occasion, by a bit of direct action, they brought Suffrage vividly to
the attention of President Wilson, Congress, and the whole country. This
was the only action of the Woman’s Party which Alice Paul did not give
out beforehand to the press.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account