The Story of the Woman's PartyGillmore, Inez Haynes
History
The Story of the Woman's Party
Gillmore, Inez Haynes
National Woman's Party; Paul, Alice, 1885-1977; Women -- Suffrage -- United States
The National Woman’s Party thought of course the President would assist
them in their campaign for Hennessy and Jameson, as they were both
Democrats as well as Suffragists and, in particular, because he had just
told the Senate that the passing of the Federal Amendment was necessary
to the successful prosecution of the war. But he gave them no help until
the Woman’s Party forced him to do so, and then it was too late. But
when the news came back from the Suffrage States of the West that the
Woman’s Party speakers were telling of his inaction, he sent—in the last
week in October—the following letter to Hennessy of New Jersey:
May I not say how deeply interested I am in the contest you are
conducting? I cannot but feel that in ignoring my earnest appeal
with regard to the Suffrage Amendment, made in public interest, and
because of my intimate knowledge of the issues involved both on the
other side of the water and here, Senator Baird has certainly not
represented the true feeling and spirit of the people of New Jersey.
I am sure that they must have felt that such an appeal could not and
should not be ignored. It would be a very great make-weight, thrown
into the international scale, if his course of action while in the
Senate could be reversed by the people of our great State.
Also, before the end of the campaign, the President came out in a
statement endorsing Jameson. But he did not work so hard to elect these
two Democrats, who were also Suffragists, as he did to defeat Vardaman
and Hardwick, both of whom were Democrats and one a Suffragist. Hennessy
and Jameson were both defeated. In the West, the election resulted in
the defeat of Senator Shafroth of Colorado, thereby handing the Senate
over to the Republicans. The defeat of Shafroth is universally ascribed
to the Woman’s Party. The Woman’s Party believed that this election had
brought them one vote, Pollock of South Carolina.
The Borah incident of the campaign of 1918 is a black page in the record
of any gentleman who has Presidential aspirations. Catherine Flanagan
and Margaret Whittemore were campaigning in western Idaho, asking the
Idaho people to bring pressure on Borah to vote for Suffrage.
Shortly after casting his vote against the Federal Amendment, Borah came
to Headquarters to see Alice Paul. He said that that vote represented
his personal belief, but that in the future he would have to be bound by
the Idaho Party (Republican) platform which had endorsed the Amendment.
He said he would not give a public statement as that would look like
trying to get votes, but he wrote out a statement that the Woman’s Party
could understand as indicating his position. That statement is as
follows:
We have talked over the Suffrage situation with Senator Borah and
our understanding from the interview is that he will carry out his
platform and vote for the Suffrage Amendment if re-elected.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account