The Story of the Woman's PartyGillmore, Inez Haynes
History
The Story of the Woman's Party
Gillmore, Inez Haynes
National Woman's Party; Paul, Alice, 1885-1977; Women -- Suffrage -- United States
This Session of Congress adjourned on October 4, 1914. At its close, the
Suffrage Amendment was upon the calendar of the Senate and the House,
ready for a vote. In the House, however, the Rules Committee must
apportion time for the vote. Mr. Mondell’s Resolution providing for
this—and for which successive deputations had besieged the Rules
Committee—was still before the Rules Committee.
The short Session—the last Session of the Sixty-third Congress—opened on
December 7. President Wilson’s message, read to Congress on December 8,
made no mention of the Woman Suffrage question, though it expressly
recommended the Bill granting further independence to the men of the
Philippines.
In December, therefore, Anne Martin, who had brought to brilliant
victory the campaign in Nevada, came to the Congressional Union’s
Headquarters in Washington. She called on the President to ask his
assistance in furthering the passage of the Bristow-Mondell Amendment.
In referring to the victory in Nevada, the President said: “That is the
way I believe it should come, by States.”
Miss Martin then pointed out to the President the immense difficulties
involved in State campaigns. She said: “The referendum campaigns are
killing work, and the women of America are working for the passage of
this Federal Amendment in order to end the long struggle.”
Miss Martin referred to the President’s attitude toward the Filipinos.
She said she had read with interest that part of his message to Congress
in which he advocated a larger measure of self-government for them. She
pointed out that Suffragists were asking for an extension of the same
right to American women, and urged him to give equal support to the
Amendment enfranchising his country-women.
* * * * *
The Congressional Union began to send deputations to the refractory
Rules Committee, immediately upon the return of the Committee members to
Washington. On December 9, Mrs. William Kent and Mrs. Gardner called
upon Chairman Henry as soon as he reached the city. To their great
astonishment, they were promptly assured by Mr. Henry that the Rules
Committee would report favorably House Resolution No. 514—providing time
for the consideration of the Suffrage Amendment in the House—which had
been before it since May 13.
“Mr. Henry said,” says the _Suffragist_ of December 12, “that he had
always desired to make a favorable report of the Suffrage rule;
certain ‘sinister influences,’ however, working upon some of the
members of this Committee had made it impossible for the Committee
to take action upon it during the last Session. Mr. Henry did not
state what the ‘sinister influences’ were, nor why they had been
removed immediately after the election.”
He also assured representatives of the Union that the Rules Committee
would shortly bring the Amendment to a vote in the House.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account