This, then, is the idolum of Coketown. There are certain features in
it which need to be noticed. The first is that there is a certain
solid reality in Coketown that remains when all its pretensions
and idiocies have been incinerated. An environment that is devoted
solely to the production of material goods is obviously no sort of
environment for a good community, for life is more than a matter of
finding what we shall eat and wherewithal we shall be clothed: it is
an interaction with a whole world of landscapes, living creatures and
ideas, in comparison with which Coketown is a mere blister on the
earth’s surface. Nevertheless, with respect to the business of melting
steel and building roads and performing certain essential industrial
operations, the aims of Coketown are, up to a certain point, relevant:
we have already encountered them in Andreæ’s Christianopolis. There is
no need to dismiss the good that lies inside of industrialism because
it does not embrace the good that lies beyond it.
Up to a certain point, then, using mechanical power rather than human
power is good; so is large-scale production, so is the division of
labor and division of operation; so is rapid transportation; so is
the accurate methodology of the engineer; and so are various other
features in the modern industrial world. One might even say a word for
efficiency, as against “doing things rather more or less.” Coketown
made the horrid mistake of believing that all these things were good in
themselves. New factories, for example, drew a bigger population into
the city: Coketown did not perceive that, as Plato pointed out, beyond
a certain point the city as a social unit would cease to exist. Bigger
and better was Coketown’s motto; and it resolutely refused to see that
there was no necessary connection between these adjectives. The whole
case for and against Coketown rests upon our admission of the phrase
“up to a certain point.” Up to a certain point, industrialism is good,
especially in its modern, neotechnic, electrical phase: Coketown, on
the other hand, believes that there is no limit to the usefulness of
industrialism.
Up to a certain point--but what point? The answer is, up to the point
at which the cultivation of a humane life in a community of humane
people becomes difficult or impossible.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account