In the utopia of the National State there are no natural regions; and
the equally natural grouping of people in towns, villages and cities,
which, as Aristotle points out, is perhaps the chief distinction
between man and the other animals, is tolerated only upon the fiction
that the State hands over to these groups a portion of its omnipotent
authority, or “sovereignty” as it is called, and permits them to
exercise a corporate life. Unfortunately for this beautiful myth, which
generations of lawyers and statesmen have labored to build up, cities
existed long before states--there was a Rome on the Tiber long before
there was a Roman Imperium--and the gracious permission of the state is
simply a perfunctory seal upon the accomplished fact.
Instead of recognizing natural regions and natural groups of people,
the utopia of nationalism establishes, by the surveyor’s line, a
certain realm called national territory, and makes all the inhabitants
of this territory the members of a single, indivisible group, the
nation, which is supposed to be prior in claim and superior in power
to all other groups. This is the only social formation that is
officially recognized within the national utopia. What is common to
all the inhabitants of this territory is thought to be of far greater
importance than any of the things that bind men together in particular
civic or industrial groups.
Let us look at this world of national utopias. The contrast between
the politician’s map and the geographer’s would be little less than
amazing were our eyes not used to it, and were we not taught in modern
times to look upon it as inevitable. Instead of the natural grouping
of land masses and regions, one finds a multitude of quite arbitrary
lines: boundaries like those that separate Canada and the United States
or Belgium and the Netherlands are just as frequent as the natural
frontier of sea that surrounds England. Sometimes these national
territories are big, and sometimes they are little; but the bigness of
empires like those of France, England, or the United States is not due
to any essential identity of interests between the sundry communities
of these empires, but to the fact that they are forcibly held together
by a political government. National lines, in other words, continue to
exist only as long as the inhabitants continue to act in terms of them;
are ready to pay their taxes to support customs bureaux, immigration
offices, frontier patrols, and educational systems; and are prepared,
in the last extremity, to lay down their lives to prevent other groups
from crossing these imaginary lines without permission.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account