Insignificant as it now appears in the annals of science, this decision
seems to me to mark a definite turning point in human thought.
Henceforth the scientist was to be one sort of person and the artist
another; henceforth the idolum of science and the idolum of art were
not to be cemented together in a single personality; henceforth, in
fact, the dehumanization of art and science begins. It is interesting
to note that with the divorce of the humanities from science, art and
science entered upon separate careers which, for all their diversities,
are curiously similar. Both art and science, for example, ceased to be
the common property of the community; and each of them split up into a
multiplying host of specialisms. In this process, art and science made
many notable advances; so that this period is usually spoken of as a
period of enlightenment or progress; but the result on the community
was what we discovered in our examination of Coketown and the Country
House.
7
We must now consider the development of the arts in the modern
community. At the height of the Middle Age, as in fifth century Athens,
the arts formed together a living unity. A citizen did not go into
a concert hall to hear music, to a church to say his prayers, to a
theatre to see a play, to a picture gallery to view pictures: it was
a mean town, indeed, that could not boast a cathedral and a couple of
churches; and in these buildings, drama and music and architecture and
painting and sculpture were united for the purpose of ringing changes
on the emotional nature of men and converting them to accept the
theological vision of otherworldly utopia.
The splitting up of these arts into a number of separate boxes was
part of that movement towards individualism and protestantism whose
effects most people are familiar with in the field of religion alone.
Henceforward, music, drama, painting, and the other arts developed
largely in isolation; and each of them was forced to build up a
separate world. The greater part of the gains that were made in these
worlds was not carried over into the community at large, but remained
the possession of the artists themselves or their private patrons and
critics in the Country House. With such exceptions as the Italian and
Japanese woodcuts of the eighteenth century, and the few survivals
of ballad and drama that slipt over from the Middle Age, popular art
became another name for all that was coarse and stunted and depressed.
The popular architecture of the nineteenth century is the sordid
little redbrick rabbit hutch: popular religion is embodied in the
stunted sheet-iron or brick chapel (as it is called in England) of the
Baptists and Methodists: popular music is the latest barrel organ lilt:
popular painting is the calendar lithograph: and popular literature is
the dime novel.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account